- Organization: Lockheed Shipbuilding Corporation
- Organization: Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.
- Clear filters
6 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016
Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)
Vernon Rublee died of mesothelioma in 2015. He had worked as a machinist at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard from 1965 to 1980, where other workers mixed and applied asbestos-containing refractory products called Insulag and Panelag around the steam…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 29, 2018 · in the opinion
Brandes v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2018)
…INC., CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERCIVES, INC.; and SABERHAGEN HOLDINGS, INC., Respondents. No…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 11, 2011 · in the opinion
Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2011)
…BOILER COMPANY, a division of AMERICAN RADIATOR & STANDARD SANITARY COMPANY; TRICO CONTRACTING, INC., TRANSALTA CENTRALIA GENERATION, LLC; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO.; WRIGHT SCHUCHART HARBOR CO., WEYERHAUSER COMPANY; ZURN INDUSTRIES LLC; GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC.;…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)
…102 S.Ct. 2579, 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982)). \[12\] The express reservation test is similar to the rule of general retroactivity discussed by this court in pre-Robinson decisions. Haines, 87 Wash.2d at…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 25, 2002 · in the opinion
Campbell v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Corp. (2002)
…Under section 905(a), a general contractor such as Lockheed will be "deemed" the employer of a subcontractor's employee for the sake of a compensation claim, but "only if the subcontractor fails to secure the…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion
Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)
…bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…