11 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 26, 2013
Baiocco v. AC & S., Inc. (2013)
…s Mate and fire control mechanic United States Navy and shipyards 1950s-1980s; signalman Boston & Maine Railroad 1950s-1980s; Pipe Coverer United States Navy 1950s-1980s; winder General Electric Schenectady 1950s-1980s; bricklayer factories, churches, schools…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2019 · in the opinion
Klopman-Baerselman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…Corporation, a Delaware Corporation formerly known as Viacom, Inc. successor in interest CBS Corporation formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation & General Electric Company, a New York corporation, Defendants, represented…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Klopman-Baerselman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…Lopez, HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON & YOUNG LLP, pro hac vice & Rachel A. Rubin, SOHA & LANG PS. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation & General Electric Company, a New York corporation, Defendants, represented by Christopher S. Marks, TANENBAUM…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion
Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)
…The 13 defendants remaining in his action are: American Biltrite, Inc., Burnham, CBS Corp., Conwed Corp., Domco Products Texas, Inc., General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Georgia-Pacific, Grinnell, Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., Mannington Mills, Inc.…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · December 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Melford v. Abex Corporation (2012)
…as the doctrine; namely "wasted resources because of piecemeal litigation, the possibility of conflicting judgments, and a general concern that the courts may unduly interfere with each other's affairs." TPM Holdings, Inc. v. Intra-Gold…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 25, 2018
Gibson v. Mack Trucks (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…answer motion) is waived under CPLR 3211(a)(8). Registering to do business in New York does not by itself confer general jurisdiction after Daimler. Personal Jurisdiction; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Russell Transfer driver for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2023)
…(Doc. No. 89-37 at PageID\# 3403.) Parker Hannifin's General Counsel, Joseph Pophal, emailed Standard Motor's General Counsel, Carmine Broccole, writing: Parker tendered 100% of Parker's defense of the Barr case to Standard…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 15, 2020 · in the opinion
Coates v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…of a summary judgment motion, as well as foregoing the ruling on such a motion either temporarily until later in the proceedings or for resolution by trial of the general issue, involves not only pure legal…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
…PROCEEDINGS Until it closed in 1989, Marcantoni was a Baltimore-based general construction contracting company that specialized in highway and utility work for local governments in the greater Baltimore area. Its headquarters was located on Broening…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2020)
…not, the Court finds that an interlocutory appeal cannot be said to materially affect the outcome of the instant case. See e.g., In re General Motors LLC, 2019 WL 8403402 at [\1] (6th Cir. Sept…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · October 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2019)
…First, Standard Motors argues the Complaint should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2) because Parker Hannifin has failed to establish the existence of either general or specific jurisdiction. Assuming there…