No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 5, 2023

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)

    Felton Robichaux worked as an insulator and carpenter at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to 1979 and alleged he was exposed to asbestos there. He first sued in 1999 with thousands of other plaintiffs and settled with GE, IMO and Viacom. After he was…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rodrigue v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2019)

    …to the Joint Defendants' motion.\[17\] Plaintiffs opposed summary judgment for only three of the Joint Defendants: General Electric Company; Foster Wheeler, LLC; and CBS Corporation.\[18\] But on April 11, 2019, plaintiffs, General Electric Company…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Legendre v. Louisiana Ins. Guaranty Association (2024)

    …a role in causing the deceased's asbestos exposure, including, but not limited to: Hopeman Brothers, Inc., International Paper Company, Paramount Global, General Electric Company, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Bayer Cropscience, Inc., Foster-Wheeler, LLC, Uniroyal, Inc.…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2002 · in the opinion

    Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2002)

    …Company, Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens Brockway Glass Container, Inc., Studebaker Worthington, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Inc., WR Grace & Co., Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Fibreboard Corp., GAF Corporation. Appeal of: John Crane, Inc., Appellant…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 30, 1999 · in the opinion

    Baker v. AC&S, Inc. (1999)

    …v. Gamble, 201 Pa. 289, 50 A. 971 (1902); Turton v. Powelton Electric Co., 185 Pa. 406, 39 A. 1053 (1898). Thus, "\[e\]ven if two parties were equally responsible for the plaintiff's injury, one…

  6. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · March 15, 1989 · in the opinion

    In re Johns-Manville Corp. (1989)

    …Thus, pursuant to ¶ 10.1(B) of the Plan and the general power of this Court, the Court retains jurisdiction to determine the instant dispute. The Plan also provides in ¶ 10.1(G) that the Court…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · June 26, 2000 · in the opinion

    Baker v. ACandS (2000)

    He provided the following context: a party who signs a general release waiving all claims and discharging all parties will be precluded from thereafter suing a party who did not contribute consideration toward the release. However…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · May 15, 1998 · in the opinion

    Porter Hayden v. Bullinger (1998)

    …verdict in favor of the hirer. The trial proceeded, resulting in judgments in favor of the plaintiff against the adverse driver and his general employer. On the plaintiff's appeal, the Court vacated the judgment in…

  9. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · August 12, 2008 · in the opinion

    Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2008)

    …the previous disability and the second injury which is materially and substantially greater than the disability that would have resulted from the second injury alone," which would have entitled him to full compensation under General Statutes …

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · December 4, 1992 · in the opinion

    In re Joint E. & So. Dist. Asbestos Litigation (1992)

    …Plan-related documents. We therefore consider whether the changes were authorized by the more general reserved power of the Bankruptcy Court to modify the Plan "to the full extent permitted by the Code." Plan § 10.1…

  11. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · November 30, 1990 · in the opinion

    In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit. (1990)

    …Unliquidated Claims on File $4.794 billion Unpaid Settlements .434 billion 47,000 Future Claims 1.840 billion \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Total $7.068 billion\[3\] (1) The Trust, as movant, represented by its General Counsel, David T. Austern…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …INSURANCE LAW—INDEMNITY—COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICIES—APPORTIONMENT—PRO RATA—TRIGGER OF COVERAGE—INJURY-IN-FACT TRIGGER—CONTINUOUS TRIGGER The Court of Appeals held that damages from a continuous bodily injury judgment must be allocated on…

  13. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · November 27, 2007 · in the opinion

    Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2007)

    …the previous disability and the second injury which is materially and substantially greater than the disability that would have resulted from the second injury alone," which would have entitled him to full compensation under General Statutes …

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Polar-Mohr Maschinenvertriebsgesellschaft Gmbh, Co. KG v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2018)

    …concluded. . . that pro rata coverage would be more fair and equitable when compared to all sums allocation, we are constrained by the language of the applicable policies"); see also Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indem. Co.…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · June 30, 1992 · in the opinion

    Feldman v. Owens-Illinois (In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation, 1992)

    …statute: "There is no justification for rewarding recalcitrant non-settling defendants by permitting them to apply the General Obligations Law offset in a manner that reduces or even obliterates their own liability in cases where plaintiffs…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Finch v. Covil Corporation (2020)

    …nature of Mr. White's representation. \[5\] Section 33-14-107(b) requires that the notice "(1) be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the dissolved corporation's principal office. …

  17. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Courville v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2020)

    …Inc. ("Eagle") and One Beacon, its commercial general liability (CGL) insurer named as a defendant by the plaintiff, brought a third-party claim against another CGL insurer, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ("USF&G") seeking…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (2021)

    …cross-claims, Covil asserted counterclaims against Zurich and cross-claims against Sentry, USF&G, TIG, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company ("Hartford"), "each of \[which\] issued general liability policies to Covil" (Docket Entry 155, ¶ 109). (Id., ¶…

  19. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · November 22, 2023 · in the opinion

    Protopapas v. Wall, Templeton & Haldrup, PA (2023)

    …20, 26, 630 S.E.2d 474, 477 (2006). In the civil context, there are three general exceptions to the mootness doctrine. First, an appellate court can take jurisdiction, despite mootness, if the issue raised is…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · July 16, 2019 · in the opinion

    Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas (2019)

    …P. 12(b)(7)). The decision under Rule 19(a) has to be made in terms of the general policies of avoiding multiple litigation, providing the parties with complete and effective relief in a single action…