No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Dykstra v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …Moraine, a Division of General Motors Corporation, Surabla Manufacturing Company, Fibreboard Corporation, Flexitallic Gasket Co., Inc., The Flintkote Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, GAF Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Gasket Corporation, General Refractories Company…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2016 · in the opinion

    Stein v. Pfizer Inc. (2016)

    …Glass Company; General Refractories Company; Koppers Company, Inc.; Universal Refractories Company; A.W. Chesterton Company; CBS Corporation; J.H. France Refractories Company; The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company; MCIC, Inc.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; General Electric Company;…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)

    …trucks during the relevant time period." (Italics added.) To support this argument, Johnson relies heavily on a footnote in a recent Supreme Court opinion, Webb v. Special Electric Co., Inc. (2016) 63 Cal.4th 167, 193…

  4. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2008 · in the opinion

    In re Quigley Co., Inc. (2008)

    …held a pre-petition claim subject to the automatic stay. The Court began by acknowledging the general proposition that "a claim implies the existence of an obligation created by State law." Id. (quoting Vanston Committee v…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · September 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    In re Quigley Company, Inc. (2010)

    …amount available for distribution applies under one chapter but not the other. For example, the trustee of an insolvent chapter 7 partnership may sue the general partners to recover any deficiencies. See 11 U.S.C. …

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)

    …requirements of predominance and superiority. In In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation, 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.) \[Hereinafter GM Trucks\], cert. denied sub nom. General Motors Corp. v…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 30, 2010 · in the opinion

    Russell v. Ford Motor Company (2010)

    …if not all, of the cars he worked on were made by Ford, General Motors or Chrysler. As part of his duties, he used an air compressor to blow the dirt off the outside of the…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 17, 2011 · in the opinion

    In re Quigley Company, Inc. (2011)

    …in-interest, and respondeat superior. The Bankruptcy Court noted that as a general matter, a company would have to act fraudulently before it could be held liable under a theory of alter ego liability. It would…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 21, 1994 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1994)

    …I. Bressman, Budd, Larner, Gross, Rosenbaum, Greenberg and Sade, P.C., Cherry Hill, NJ, for General Reinsurance Corp., etal., third-party defendants. Michael J. Geraghty, Sean R. Kelly, David D'Aloia, Saiber, Schlesinger, Satz & Goldstein, Newark…

  10. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · January 12, 2009 · in the opinion

    Polanco v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2009)

    …However, it was a matter of general knowledge from the 1960s onward that prolonged exposure to airborne asbestos could possibly be harmful." Affidavit of Dr. Edwin Holstein stating that asbestos fibers are potentially dangerous to the…