No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

19 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)

    Felton Robichaux sued Avondale (Huntington Ingalls) and many other companies in Louisiana state court, alleging he developed mesothelioma, diagnosed in January 2022, from asbestos exposure. He alleged he worked at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)

    Felton Robichaux sued Huntington Ingalls (Avondale) and many other defendants in Louisiana state court. He alleged he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to 1979 as a carpenter and insulator.…

  3. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 31, 2007

    Asbestos Corporation Limited v. Akaiwa (2007)

    …summary judgment is limited to the materials designated to the trial court, so evidence first offered on appeal is not considered. Product Identification; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Everett Electric electrical contractor Everett Electric 1980-1982

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · January 9, 2017 · in the opinion

    Grimes v. AT&T Corp. (2017)

    …LLP. FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, Cross Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER J. KEALE, SEDGWICK LLP & DAVID SCHUYLER BLOW, SEDGWICK LLP. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Cross Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER J. KEALE, SEDGWICK LLP & DAVID SCHUYLER BLOW, SEDGWICK LLP. IMO…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    …reach the consumer in the same condition as it left the manufacturer\]; and Artiglio v. General Electric Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 830, 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 817 \[silcone supplier not liable to user of…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · October 23, 2017 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2017)

    …Marks, SEDGWICK LLP & Erin P. Fraser, SEDGWICK LLP. Gardner-Denver Inc, Defendant, represented by Claude Bosworth, RIZZO MATTINGLY BOSWORTH PC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Christopher S. Marks, SEDGWICK LLP & Erin P. Fraser, SEDGWICK LLP…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …that exposure sufficient to cause asbestosis is also sufficient to cause mesothelioma, lung cancer, and pleural plaques. \[18\] The crafts were divided into four general groupings: "Production Crafts" (some thirteen in all, including e.g. pumper…

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 28, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …and Johnny Johnson. CBS Corporation, formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Westinghouse), settled and dismissed their appeals with all plaintiffs but Earlven Gauthe and Johnny Johnson after oral argument, but days before…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 29, 2015

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2015)

    …of asbestos knowledge, the Walsh-Healey Act, specific risk percentages, life expectancy, and general symptoms and quality of life, plus an unlisted 1956 article. It also struck his rebuttal report to Dr. Stockman. It kept the…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 30, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)

    \[131\] There are two exceptions to the general rule that would allow creditors to proceed against the debtor for the post-petition interest: (1) when a creditor is oversecured under § 506(b); and (2) under § 726…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 11, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)

    Moreover, the General Growth Properties Court relied on several equitable considerations in arriving at its decision, including that the default rate would not constitute a "penalty" to the "exceedingly solvent" debtor, a lack of misconduct, and…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 12, 1991

    Mitchell, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty (1991)

    …the insured, was entitled to a defense and indemnity because coverage is triggered at least by exposure to its asbestos products during the policy period. Under a standard form comprehensive general liability policy, "bodily injury" from…

  13. Court case · Montana Supreme Court · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion

    Maryland Cas. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Court (2020)

    …and through it, the general public." He expressed particular concern the Mill workers' union or local attorneys could become aware of the scope of the lung damage issues at the Mill. ¶76 Larrick also informed Hopkins…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Genusa v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2014)

    …Accordingly, this court has held that the current version of 28 U.S.C. § 1441 allows removal of general maritime claims without requiring an additional source of federal jurisdiction. See Garza v. Phillips 66 Co., No…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …INSURANCE LAW—INDEMNITY—COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICIES—APPORTIONMENT—PRO RATA—TRIGGER OF COVERAGE—INJURY-IN-FACT TRIGGER—CONTINUOUS TRIGGER The Court of Appeals held that damages from a continuous bodily injury judgment must be allocated on…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Asbestos Corporation Limited (2013)

    …C. § 1332(a). In removal cases, as a general rule, "diversity of citizenship must exist both at the time of filing in state court and at the time of removal to federal court." Coury v. Prot…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)

    …2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 23, 1996 · in the opinion

    Kellogg v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (1996)

    …two statutes, a court must construe the statutes in the context of the entire statutory system of which they are a part in order to achieve harmony with other statutes on the same general subject. This…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 7, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rogers v. Asbestos Corp. Limited (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …2d 1116 (Del. Super. 1986). It is well-established that a plaintiff does not meet his burden of proof by simply placing the product at the general work site. Conway v. A.C.& S, C.A…