No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1999 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Metalclad Insulation Corp. (1999)

    General Motors Corp., supra, 40 Cal.App.4th at p. 356, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 580; Barr v. ACandS, Inc., supra, 57 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1049-1053, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 494.) The issue…

  2. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 15, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weihl v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2006)

    …in a general fashion. He then alleged that defendants were "regularly engaged in the business of manufacturing, designing, processing, marketing, distributing, applying, repairing, and/or selling products containing asbestos fiber for use in electrical products and…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 1990

    Uram v. Abex Corp. (1990)

    …run long before 1987. For Virginia's consortium claim, the court applied the general one-year statute with a discovery rule. It found she should likewise have suspected the cause in 1976, so her claim was…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)

    …Cadlo's\] contraction of cancer, \[Maxlyn Cadlo\] would have continued her marital relationship with him for another 20 years." (See Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1125, 1152 \[briefs are reliable indications…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 14, 2012 · in the opinion

    Couscouris v. Hatch Grinding Wheels, Inc. (2012)

    …2012. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL GEORGE H. KING, District Judge. Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re: Motion for Remand and for Award of Costs Incurred This matter is before us on…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion

    Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)

    …914 F.2d 360, 372-373, 383.) Other cases dispense entirely with evidence of where a product was used by merely requiring proof that it was in general use at an industrial facility. Thus, Martin v…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Ganoe v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2014)

    …response, the plaintiff provided "little more than general allegations against" the defendant and "d\[id\] not state specific facts showing that \[the plaintiff\] was actually exposed to asbestos-containing material from \[the defendant's\] products." (Id…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …or dust allaying media. (Stewart Decl. ex G).\[2\] Plaintiff also emphasizes Defendant's concession that it was familiar with and subject to California general industry safety orders (Caldo Trans. 2162:16-22), that it knew…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 27, 2006 · in the opinion

    Hopkins v. Plant Insulation Company (2006)

    …at 1079. Like federal habeas law, federal bankruptcy law creates exceptions to the general rule of federal deference to state court judgments by empowering bankruptcy courts to avoid or modify state judgments. Id. For certain bankruptcy…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON, Inc. (2014)

    …34); Gould MTD (Dkt. \# 36).) II. ANALYSIS A. Removal Jurisdiction In general, a defendant may remove to federal court any state action over which a district court would have original jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. …

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …d\] that Soco West, Inc. is not subject to jurisdiction in the State of Washington." Plant Insulation Company presented a declaration from its general counsel. Based upon his personal knowledge, he averred that the company was…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 1994 · in the opinion

    Williamson v. Plant Insulation Co. (1994)

    …The proceedings here had not reached that stage when Wash Williamson died. (4) "The general rule is that \courts have inherent power to enter judgments nunc pro tunc so as to relate back to the time…