No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 15, 2008 · in the opinion

    Sarkozy v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2008)

    …FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, individually and as successor to The Duriron Company, Inc., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, FROMM ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORP., GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION, GENERAL SUPPLY COMPANY, GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, GREENE…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 23, 2011 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2011)

    …money must be used to pay claims, that general liability under the Joint Tort-feasors Act is established by the fact of the creation of the Trust and payment of settlement. We disagree. Under the Act…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1999 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Metalclad Insulation Corp. (1999)

    General Motors Corp., supra, 40 Cal.App.4th at p. 356, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 580; Barr v. ACandS, Inc., supra, 57 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1049-1053, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 494.) The issue…

  4. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 15, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weihl v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2006)

    …in a general fashion. He then alleged that defendants were "regularly engaged in the business of manufacturing, designing, processing, marketing, distributing, applying, repairing, and/or selling products containing asbestos fiber for use in electrical products and…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    at 4-5.) To the extent that this argument overlaps with Scapa's more general argument regarding causation, the court will address the issue in the following section. See infra § III.B.3; (see JMOL Mot…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)

    …Cadlo's\] contraction of cancer, \[Maxlyn Cadlo\] would have continued her marital relationship with him for another 20 years." (See Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1125, 1152 \[briefs are reliable indications…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 14, 2012 · in the opinion

    Couscouris v. Hatch Grinding Wheels, Inc. (2012)

    …2012. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL GEORGE H. KING, District Judge. Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re: Motion for Remand and for Award of Costs Incurred This matter is before us on…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · January 15, 2014 · in the opinion

    Estate of Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc. (2014)

    …review and publication; 3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and 4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community." United States v. Hankey, 203 F…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · November 16, 2012 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc. (2012)

    …recognize an impeachment exception to the collateral source rule, but relied only on the "well-established" general rule. Because there appear to be good grounds to recognize an impeachment exception to the Washington collateral source rule…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    …review and publication; (3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Ganoe v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2014)

    …response, the plaintiff provided "little more than general allegations against" the defendant and "d\[id\] not state specific facts showing that \[the plaintiff\] was actually exposed to asbestos-containing material from \[the defendant's\] products." (Id…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …or dust allaying media. (Stewart Decl. ex G).\[2\] Plaintiff also emphasizes Defendant's concession that it was familiar with and subject to California general industry safety orders (Caldo Trans. 2162:16-22), that it knew…

  13. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)

    …tested; whether it has been the subject of peer review; whether the theory has a known or potential error rate; and whether the theory has gained general acceptance in the scientific community. Daubert, 509 U.S…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON, Inc. (2014)

    …34); Gould MTD (Dkt. \# 36).) II. ANALYSIS A. Removal Jurisdiction In general, a defendant may remove to federal court any state action over which a district court would have original jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. …

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …d\] that Soco West, Inc. is not subject to jurisdiction in the State of Washington." Plant Insulation Company presented a declaration from its general counsel. Based upon his personal knowledge, he averred that the company was…