No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 7, 2022

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2022)

    The court granted General Electric and ViacomCBS's motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims for punitive damages and loss of consortium damages under general maritime law, but denied it as to the California negligence and strict…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 28, 2017

    Herman v. Ametek (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2017)

    Maynard Herman and his wife Irene sued Ametek, Inc. and other companies in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. They alleged that Mr. Herman's work exposed him to asbestos and that he developed mesothelioma. Defendants removed the case to federal…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion

    Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)

    …Speck was to any work done on or around a General Electric product or product of another defendant\[,\]" and has "no idea" about the quantity of asbestos fibers to which Speck may have been exposed by…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · September 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lara v. CBS Corp. (2013)

    …2013. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge. Proceedings: ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (In Chambers) Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Immediately Remand Plaintiffs…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION As an initial matter, the…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …motion to exclude plaintiffs' expert Dr. Brody (he may give general but not specific causation testimony) and denied Warren Pumps' and Honeywell's motion to exclude "every exposure" testimony, without prejudice to renewed objections at trial…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Murphy v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. (2016)

    …with a motion and proposed order to have the exceptions set for hearing, in state court. In general, "\[a\] waiver of the right to remove must be clear and unequivocal." Furthermore, as explained in Bourdier v…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 10, 2023 · in the opinion

    Wilgenbusch v. Metalclad Insulation LLC (2023)

    …has held that comparative fault principles apply when apportioning liability between a strictly liable party and a negligent party. (See e.g., Daly v. General Motors Corp. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 725, 736-737; Safeway Stores…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kardos v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc. (2019)

    …Note: Rule 1035.2 sets forth the general principle that a motion for summary judgment is based on an evidentiary record which entitles the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. \ \ \ Pa.R.C…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Clayton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …negligence, premises liability, conspiracy, and strict liability for abnormally dangerous activities. (SAC § V.) They seek general and special damages for pain, suffering, "loss of spousal relationship," disability, medical expenses, and economic loss. (Id.) Saberhagen moves for…