No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 2013

    Ambruso v. Goulds Pumps (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2013)

    …D. Roosevelt electrical engineer 1950s-1980s; shipfitter and seaman in the United States Navy Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1940s; shipfitter and seaman in the United States Navy USS Chicago 1940s; insulator 1950s-1990s; general laborer, bus…

  2. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · October 14, 2010

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Pittman (2010)

    Lonnie Pittman was named as a plaintiff in a December 2002 asbestos suit against many companies. Defendants later learned he had died in March 2001, almost two years before the suit was filed. His widow, Mary Pittman, was substituted as plaintiff…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Klopman-Baerselman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …Marc Marshall Carlton, LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP & Randy J. Aliment, LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation & General Electric Company, a New York corporation, Defendants, represented by Christopher S. Marks…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 24, 2000 · in the opinion

    Vasura v. Acands (2000)

    …448, 451 (9th Cir.1994). Others have held that the relevant time period for ascertaining foreign state status is that in which the conduct at issue took place. See General Electric Capital Corp. v. Grossman, 991…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997 · in the opinion

    Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)

    …3\] (Emphasis added). In addition, the legislative history of C.J. § 11-108 indicates that the General Assembly intended that the cap apply broadly, as opposed to only malpractice claims. In January 1986, Senate Bill No…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 7, 1998 · in the opinion

    ACandS v. Abate (1998)

    The Western Electric plant was comprised of several buildings and was approximately three miles long and one-and-one-quarter miles deep. Morrow indicated that he worked primarily in the wire insulation building until he became…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2019

    Rosen v. Genuine Parts Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …against them for lack of personal jurisdiction, and severed and dismissed them. A corporation is subject to general jurisdiction where it is incorporated or has its principal place of business, and specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas · December 21, 2018

    Thomas v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2018)

    …old brakes, since Arkansas has not adopted market share liability. All other claims survived. The court found factual disputes over general causation, frequency of exposure, design defect and the adequacy of Honeywell's warnings. It applied…

  9. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 14, 2001

    Hoffman v. AC&S, Inc. (2001)

    …site at some unspecified time during the 1960s is insufficient. An expert's general opinion that workers were exposed to asbestos products does not supply the missing link to a particular defendant. Product Identification; Expert Testimony…

  10. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · March 17, 1999

    Novicki v. Rapid-American Corp. (1999)

    …and Rapid-American conceded it did not. The case therefore fell under section 5, the general product liability limitation and repose provision. Because the parties had not briefed section 5, the court remanded for further argument…

  11. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · November 30, 2000 · in the opinion

    Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp. (2000)

    …American argues that Pustejovsky's lack of knowledge of the scope of his damages from his exposure to asbestos does not affect the accrual of his cause of action. Following these general rules, Rapid American contends…

  12. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001 · in the opinion

    Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)

    …[\1036] Moreover, section 2 was enacted to extend the general limitations period in express recognition of the long latency period associated with asbestos-related diseases and illnesses. Extending the limitations period only for the very few…

  13. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)

    …distribution." Id. at 148. Since Tabert, the court repeatedly has confirmed that as a general rule, strict products liability applies to all persons in the chain of distribution of a product. Macias, 175 Wn.2d at…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 31, 2016 · in the opinion

    Wells v. 3M Co. (2016)

    …plaintiff must be considered to have discovered such an injury when he or she is actually diagnosed as suffering from a particular disease, even though unaware of its cause" (Sweeney v General Print., 210 AD2d 865…

  15. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 17, 2001 · in the opinion

    Crooks v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …principle of stare decisis, the civil law statutes and codes are usually drafted in more general terms than common-law statutes and thus depend more on judges to render them concrete through judicial interpretation. Id. The…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 29, 1997 · in the opinion

    Mtr. OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (1997)

    …attributed to the settling defendants would have been increased and that of Carey correspondingly decreased. Such a result would clearly be damaging to the plaintiffs by reason of the application of General Obligations Law § 15-108…