No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation (2006)

    …Johnson, Cantu & Schmidt, P.L.C., Seattle, WA, for defendant Owens-Illinois, Inc. [\123] OPINION SLIGHTS, J. I. By motion in limine, Defendant, DaimlerChrysler Corporation ("Chrysler"), invites the Court to weigh in on a debate that…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion

    Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)

    …asbestos products in Indiana and California. He contends that the trial court erroneously split the cause of action into California and Indiana components, contrary to statements by our Supreme Court in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.

  3. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 1, 2022

    Carroll v. Akebono Brake Corporation (2022)

    …order striking Marjorie Carroll's complaint against Nissan as a discovery sanction and remanded, and affirmed the $1,000 fee sanction against attorney Owens, rejecting Nissan's cross-appeal. A court may strike a complaint as…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)

    … 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…