12 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · December 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Melford v. Abex Corporation (2012)
…as the doctrine; namely "wasted resources because of piecemeal litigation, the possibility of conflicting judgments, and a general concern that the courts may unduly interfere with each other's affairs." TPM Holdings, Inc. v. Intra-Gold…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
Tens of thousands of people sued in state courts across the country, claiming that asbestos in friction products such as brake pads gave them or their relatives mesothelioma, lung, laryngeal or esophageal cancer, or asbestosis. They sued makers and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 2018
Chen v. Volkswagen Group of America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…asked to dismiss the case because Texas was a more convenient forum. The court held that it lacked general jurisdiction over Volkswagen and Nissan. It found long-arm jurisdiction proper because Chen's testimony and the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 26, 2019
Gayoso v. Nissan North America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…assert it with specificity in its answer, and general denials do not preserve it. Where the parties' experts rely on conflicting studies, issues of fact on general and specific causation preclude summary judgment. Causation; Expert Testimony…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 20, 2019
Temperino v. Amchem Prods. (2019)
…cigarettes a day for about 37 years. Honda moved for summary judgment, arguing plaintiff could not prove general or specific causation. Several other defendants asked the court to bar plaintiff's medical experts and, if successful…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 1, 2022 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Akebono Brake Corporation (2022)
…and that it should be construed, not as a grant of power to make broad and general rules, but as a limitation upon the courts requiring that the customary rules having to do with the minutiæ…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion
Colvin v. Eaton Corporation (2019)
…in which the party responds but the response is incomplete or otherwise objectionable. Rules Commentary at 436-37.\[3\] As a general matter, the first step in obtaining a judicial resolution of a discovery dispute is…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Steiner v. Volkswagen Group OF America, Inc. (2013)
…fn. 22. As defendants point out, Ledesma referred to the scope of expert cross-examination in general, as set forth in section 721, subdivision (a), and did not address the limits of permissible cross-examination regarding…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Davis v. Ace Hardware Corporation (2014)
…at 750-52. In a non-fraud case, Federal Rule 8's "General Rules of Pleading" apply, requiring that a complaint in federal court contain only a "short and plain statement of the claim showing that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…October 14, 2020, Dr. Staggs sets forth the general principles of asbestos-related disease; discusses the studies and reports identifying a causal relationship between asbestos-containing products and diseases such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…No. 20\]. The same analysis is true for the Plaintiffs' claims based on the duty to warn. As the Fourth Circuit explained in Baughman v. General Motors Corporation, 780 F.2d 1131, 1132-33 (4th Cir…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 10, 2019 · in the opinion
Mercatante v. PACCAR (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…any admissible evidence of causation, and that plaintiffs' expert reports do not establish either general or specific causation. A defendant cannot obtain summary judgment simply by "pointing to gaps in plaintiffs' proof" (Ricci v. A.O…