No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

159 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 8

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · November 12, 1992

    Becht v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    The Sixth Circuit affirmed the judgment for plaintiff Ann Becht against Owens-Corning, holding it was not entitled to workers' compensation immunity and that the jury's 40% fault allocation and the denial of a new…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 13, 1995

    Higgins v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The Appellate Division reversed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded for a new trial in favor of plaintiff Higgins, and dismissed Owens-Corning's cross appeal on the medical monitoring award as moot. A…

  3. Court case · Wisconsin Supreme Court · October 27, 1999

    Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's order dismissing the Sophas' mesothelioma action against Owens-Corning and the other defendants as time-barred, and remanded for further proceedings. A diagnosis of a non-malignant…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 9, 1981

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1981)

    …Keene, Armstrong Cork, Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and the third-party defendants, holding that the Wisconsin limitations period runs from the plaintiff's last exposure to any asbestos-containing product, and it set a schedule for…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …liability findings and compensatory awards for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and Porter Hayden, but reversed the $1.5 million punitive damages award against Owens-Corning in the Scruggs case. A bystander's proof…

  7. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 24, 1989

    District of Columbia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1989)

    The District of Columbia sued thirty-seven miners, manufacturers, sellers and distributors of asbestos. It sought removal costs and other damages for asbestos in roughly 2,400 public buildings, including schools, libraries, hospitals, government…

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 12, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Schmidt (1996)

    …s prejudgment interest calculation and its taxing of ad litem fees against the minor plaintiffs, and otherwise affirmed the judgment against Owens-Corning, denying it a malpractice credit and a pro rata settlement credit. A defendant…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 11, 1998

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    The appellate court affirmed the jury verdicts for plaintiffs Bicknell, Thacker and McClure against Owens Corning Fiberglas and (in McClure) Owens-Illinois, and remanded only so the trial court could apply setoffs for settlements with other…

  10. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …and ordered judgment entered for Owens Corning and Owens-Illinois because the evidence did not prove a civil conspiracy. Parallel conduct by manufacturers of the same or similar products may be circumstantial evidence of a civil…

  11. Trade catalog or brochure · WARD Documents · 1951

    Kaylo Block and Pipe Insulation Product Literature, Owens-Illinois and Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1951–1970)

    …Kaylo 10 STS, made with inhibitors against stress corrosion of stainless steel, the chloride problem that also led Owens-Corning in 1961 to stop using J-M chrysotile in Kaylo: see G. C. Stefango to Don…

  12. Company document · JM Document Review · March 20, 1953

    Owens-Illinois and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Agreements for the Sale of Kaylo (1953)

    What it shows From 1953, Owens-Corning Fiberglas was a large buyer and reseller of Kaylo that Owens-Illinois made at Berlin, New Jersey. The Sales Agreement required that "All sales and advertisements of Kaylo Heat…

  13. Company document · JM Document Review · May 9, 1958

    Owens-Illinois Sale of Its Kaylo Division to Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1958)

    What it shows Owens-Corning bought the raw materials, work in process, finished goods and supplies at the Berlin plant for $633,661.41; all trademarks relating only to Kaylo for $17,500; the Berlin land…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 8, 1991

    Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1991)

    The Second Circuit reversed the judgment for the plaintiff against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, because the revival statute's exception applied. Under New York's 1986…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Illinois, upholding the demurrer to the fraud, misrepresentation and concert-of-action claims and the summary judgment on the product claims, against plaintiffs Anthony and Maxlyn Cadlo…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · June 30, 1992

    Feldman v. Owens-Illinois (In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation, 1992)

    Workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, and families of those who died, sued makers of asbestos insulation products for diseases including lung cancer, colon cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, pleural disease and asbestosis. The jury, in a joint…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 7, 1992

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong (1992)

    The Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the compensatory verdicts for workers Armstrong and Wood against Owens-Illinois, but reversed the punitive damages awards and remanded for new trials limited to punitive damages. A trial judge…

  18. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    573 So.2d 704 (1990) OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; Pittsburgh Corning Corp.; Hopeman Brothers, Inc.; Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and Dmn Electric Supply Co., Inc. v. Charles Gavin EDWARDS. No. 90…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)

    …on behalf of Russell against \[Pittsburgh Corning Corporation\]. Id. at 355, 667 A.2d 116. In applying the proximity, frequency, and regularity test according to the standards utilized in Balbos, Godwin, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  20. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 3, 1997

    Kurak v. AP Green Refractories Co. (1997)

    The Appellate Division reversed the judgment against Owens-Illinois, holding it was entitled to judgment in its favor. It affirmed the finding of liability against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, but ordered a new trial on damages, or…