24 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1989 · in the opinion
Board of Education v. A, C & S, Inc. (1989)
…the defendant (Sawyer, 89 Ill.2d at 384 (real estate brokers must follow the regulations created by the Department of Registration and Education); Heimgaertner v. Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Co. (1955), 6 Ill.2d 152, 153-54 …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · November 7, 1990 · in the opinion
Independent School Dist. No. 197 v. WR Grace (1990)
…announced the subject more clearly in its title, the 1987 enactment of the revival statute, did fall within the embrace of "some one general subject," i.e., insurance. While the revival statute does not specifically refer…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · December 1, 2005 · in the opinion
US v. WR Grace & Co. (2005)
…§ 300.415(e) sets forth examples of activities that are "as a general rule," appropriate as part of a removal action, but notes that the list "is not exhaustive and is not intended to prevent the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · April 3, 1992 · in the opinion
Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)
…the court must consider all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. White v. Westinghouse Electric Company, 862 F.2d 56, 59 (3d Cir.1988). Evidentiary issues Defendants contend that: (1) plaintiff…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 28, 2001 · in the opinion
Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)
…and Johnny Johnson. CBS Corporation, formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Westinghouse), settled and dismissed their appeals with all plaintiffs but Earlven Gauthe and Johnny Johnson after oral argument, but days before…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 1999 · in the opinion
Owens Corning v. Bauman (1999)
…it is not within our purview to usurp [\766] the legislative function of the General Assembly or to overrule a decision of the Court of Appeals. Maryland Declaration of Rights and Maryland Constitution Amicus White Lung…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 29, 2009
In re WR Grace & Co. (2009)
The State of California, Department of General Services, filed sixteen property damage claims in W.R. Grace's Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The claims concerned asbestos-containing materials Grace made that were in sixteen state-owned buildings…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 30, 2012 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)
\[131\] There are two exceptions to the general rule that would allow creditors to proceed against the debtor for the post-petition interest: (1) when a creditor is oversecured under § 506(b); and (2) under § 726…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 11, 2012 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)
Moreover, the General Growth Properties Court relied on several equitable considerations in arriving at its decision, including that the default rate would not constitute a "penalty" to the "exceedingly solvent" debtor, a lack of misconduct, and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 9, 2023 · in the opinion
Wells v. BNSF Railway Company (2023)
…to \[the Robinson defendants'\] unreasonably dangerous asbestos contaminated products, which \[the Robinson defendants\] wrongfully placed in the stream of commerce for use and consumption by the general public"; 2) the Robinson defendants "knew that extended exposure…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999 · in the opinion
Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)
…For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the general rule imposing the burden on the plaintiff should be applied in this case against appellees. A. THE BURDEN TO ESTABLISH THAT THE STATUTORY CAP DOES NOT…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999 · in the opinion
Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)
…emotional distress, intentional tort, conspiracy [\389] and loss of consortium; and sought general, special and punitive damages against no fewer than 215 named defendants and 300 unnamed does. Specifically, the complaint alleged that as a result…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 17, 2004 · in the opinion
In re Kensington International Limited (2004)
…a distinction between newly-appointed and veteran judges; the general prohibition against ex part e communications on the merits applies to all judges. As for the second safeguard, we must first assume that all parties took…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2006)
…that is, that \the dose makes the poison,' which refers to the general tendency for a greater dose of a toxin to cause greater severity of responses in individuals, as well as greater frequency of response…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · October 26, 1993 · in the opinion
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. WR Grace & Co. (1993)
…the design and construction of improvements to real property ... so that they and their [\1059] families are not liable all their lives and beyond lives and into the graves. Eighty-First Illinois General Assembly, House Proceedings…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 31, 2005 · in the opinion
Owens Corning v. Credit Suisse First Boston (2005)
…jurisdictions, to deter tortious conduct which ended more than twenty years ago. Adjusting the Forecast to Account for Changed Conditions There is general agreement that the values assigned to valid claims for mesothelioma, lung cancer, and…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 23, 1999 · in the opinion
Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. James (1999)
…exposure to asbestos. The issue really is the more general one—whether forcing any movant to await final judgment makes the issue of inconvenient forum effectively non-reviewable. Our view as to that was, to some…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)
…product." Id. (quoting Calles, 309 Ill.Dec. 383, 864 N.E.2d at 264) (citing Sobczak v. General Motors Corp., 373 Ill.App.3d 910, 312 Ill.Dec. 682, 871 N.E.2d 82, 94 (2007…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · April 23, 1998 · in the opinion
Strickland v. Owens Corning (1998)
…there was no evidence that Kaylo distributed by Defendant, or even Kaylo in general, accounted for most of Hagan's exposure to asbestos during that period or any period. It is clear that Owens Corning was…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 1, 1981 · in the opinion
Fusco v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1981)
…1975) is not in point. In Kellum, the court determined that the United States in general was not subject to state statutes of limitations; however, nothing in the opinion indicates that a state statute of limitations…