12 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · February 19, 2016 · in the opinion
Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2016)
…INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. BRIAN HECKEL, Individually and as Special Administrator on behalf of the Estate of Sharon Heckel, Plaintiff, v. CBS CORP., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Defendants. DIANNE JACOBS, Individually…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2016)
…WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Defendant. BRIAN HECKEL, Individually and as Special Administrator on behalf of the Estate of Sharon Heckel, Plaintiff, v. CBS CORP., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Defendants. DIANNE JACOBS, Individually…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)
…General Electric ("GE"), denied manufacturing any turbines used at the jobsites, and the estate failed to rebut this assertion. Id. at 575. While GE admitted that a "small percentage" of electrical wires and cables contained a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 3, 2015 · in the opinion
Feaster v. AW Chesterton Company (2015)
…about May 30, 2014, this action was removed to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by Defendants Foster Wheeler Corp. and General Electric Company pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 27, 2020
Hill v. Mallinckrodt LLC (2020)
The district court denied Mallinckrodt's Rule 12(b)(7) motion to dismiss for failure to join the settled general contractors, so the executor's wrongful-death suit proceeds. A party is not a required party…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion
Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)
…2008) WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, and OLD REPUBLIC…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · March 7, 2016
Pecher v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2016)
…while evidence of occupational exposure and workers' compensation is limited or kept out of the liability phase. General, unspecific requests to exclude expert testimony or untimely evidence are denied without prejudice to specific objections. Expert Testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · November 22, 1994 · in the opinion
Perrin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)
…that the defendants' products were located at shipyards where the Parks was overhauled, and were used by shipyard workers on ships in general, does not support a reasonable inference that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Kilty v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (2018)
…page in each of their opposition briefs responding to this argument, the bulk of which amounts to broad, general references to their experts' testimony. Moreover, plaintiffs utterly fail to engage with defendant's specific arguments challenging…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2014)
…of action and actual damages). \[4\] To the extent plaintiffs rely on general allegations of asbestos exposure from landfills or in the air within the larger community — in other words, exposure entirely unrelated to his employment…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 11, 1986 · in the opinion
Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…Applicable Law. We begin with the proposition that in a tort action, as a general rule, proof that a [\1457] specific defendant caused the plaintiff's harm is a prerequisite to that defendant's liability to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Kilty v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2018)
…nor in the Seventh Circuit's general "affirm\[ance of\] the multiple rulings of the district court dismissing the claims against both defendants on appeal and denying reconsideration," suggested that court was taking a harder line…