No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

33 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    Vernon Rublee died of mesothelioma in 2015. He had worked as a machinist at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard from 1965 to 1980, where other workers mixed and applied asbestos-containing refractory products called Insulag and Panelag around the steam…

  2. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2018)

    …Viacom, Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, [\1208] f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Elliott Company; General Electric Company; IMO Industries, Inc., individually and as successor in interest to De Laval Turbine…

  3. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)

    …f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; ELLIOTT COMPANY; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as successor in interest to DE…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Dykstra v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …Moraine, a Division of General Motors Corporation, Surabla Manufacturing Company, Fibreboard Corporation, Flexitallic Gasket Co., Inc., The Flintkote Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, GAF Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Gasket Corporation, General Refractories Company…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · April 4, 2018 · in the opinion

    Kister v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC, Jennifer Ann Kapes, Swartz Campbell LLC & Allison L. Texter, Swartz Campbell LLC. Certainteed Corporation & General Electric Company, Cross Defendants, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Foster Wheeler LLC, Cross Defendant…

  6. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    … 15-1-35, citing the general rule that the statute began to run from the date of publication of the allegedly libelous statement to a third person. Staheli argued that the statute did not begin to…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Ms. Finch has not shown that Pfizer reasonably should have known that the pre-1978 records may have…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 24, 1979 · in the opinion

    Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co. (1979)

    …defective product. See Urie v. Thompson, 337 U.S. 163, 69 S.Ct. 1018, 11 A.L.R.2d 252; Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. Barker, 228 F.2d 842; Brush Beryllium Co. v. Meckley, 284…

  9. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 24, 1989 · in the opinion

    District of Columbia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1989)

    …hospitals, and government offices, are for the general use of the public, and hundreds or even thousands of people pass through each of them every day. Any child who grows up in the District and attends…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 30, 1986 · in the opinion

    Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1986)

    …a given industry. They are often set forth in some type of code, such as a building code or electrical code, or they may be adopted by the trade organization of a given industry. State of…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 17, 2020

    Peterson v. Vanderbilt Mineral (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …them earlier was inadvertent and the other side shows no prejudice. Conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise fact issues that bar summary judgment, and a venue change motion served long after the answer…

  12. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2003)

    …applied. One statute covers asbestos claims against those who mined and sold asbestos. The other is the general ten-year statute of repose for product claims. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. The…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · June 26, 2000 · in the opinion

    Baker v. ACandS (2000)

    He provided the following context: a party who signs a general release waiving all claims and discharging all parties will be precluded from thereafter suing a party who did not contribute consideration toward the release. However…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · February 28, 1986 · in the opinion

    Joyce v. AC and S., Inc. (1986)

    No ordinary disease of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall be compensable, except: (1) When it follows as an incident of occupational disease as defined in this title; or…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Peterson v. Vanderbilt Minerals (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …Defendant argues that plaintiffs failed to proffer any expert opinion or other evidence establishing general and specific causation and there is no basis to sustain the cause of action for punitive damages. To prevail on a…

  16. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion

    Burns v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    … John Crane, Inc.; DAP, Inc.; Fibreboard Corporation; GAF Corporation; General Refractories Company; Harbison-Walker Refractories Company; Harcros Chemicals, Inc., as Successor-in-Interest to Thompson-Hayward Chemical Company; Kaiser Refractories, A Division of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · January 14, 1980 · in the opinion

    Mooney v. Fibreboard Corp. (1980)

    …discretion to determine when it should be applied. The general rule should be that in cases where a plaintiff could easily have joined in the earlier action or where, either for the reasons discussed above or…

  18. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · September 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    In re Quigley Company, Inc. (2010)

    …amount available for distribution applies under one chapter but not the other. For example, the trustee of an insolvent chapter 7 partnership may sue the general partners to recover any deficiencies. See 11 U.S.C. …

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1982)

    …to his health. We thus regard Wisconsin Natural Gas to be an exceptional application of the more general rule that the cause of action accrues when the asbestos-caused disease becomes diagnosable — e.g., provable by…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)

    …requirements of predominance and superiority. In In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation, 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.) \[Hereinafter GM Trucks\], cert. denied sub nom. General Motors Corp. v…