No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

23 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 24, 1989

    District of Columbia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1989)

    The District of Columbia sued thirty-seven miners, manufacturers, sellers and distributors of asbestos. It sought removal costs and other damages for asbestos in roughly 2,400 public buildings, including schools, libraries, hospitals, government…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · June 26, 2000

    Baker v. ACandS (2000)

    …Baker's loss of consortium. The opinion does not describe where or how he was exposed. The Bakers settled with Owens-Corning, Pfizer and ACME under pro rata releases, and with the Manville Trust for $30…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Dykstra v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …App.3d at 461, 243 Ill.Dec. 579, 723 N.E.2d at 1182. In Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 276 Ill.App.3d 1099, 213 Ill.Dec. 532, 659 N.E.2d 448 (1995…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …Aurora Pump Co., 2004 WL 2222935, at [\1] (Conn. Super. Sept. 14, 2004) (quoting Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F. Supp. 172, 174 (W.D. Mich. 1989)). "The plaintiff must produce evidence sufficient to…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion

    Burns v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …184. An ability to try a case in an expeditious manner [\384] has also been recognized as a private- interest factor. Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 276 Ill.App.3d 1099, 213 Ill.Dec. 532…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)

    …in Tennessee, there would be personal jurisdiction over all defendants there through the Tennessee Long-Arm Statute. Respondents rely primarily on Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen), to support…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 711 So.2d 1167, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), following Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549, 558 (1991). Under…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 24, 2019 · in the opinion

    Stock v. Jenkins Bros. (IN the Matter of the Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Litig.\[Rosini\], 256 AD2d 250, 252 \[1st Dept 1988\]; Zalinka v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 221 AD2d 830, 831 (3rd Dept 1995). Based on the proof submitted by the defendant, the apportionment made by the jury…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · June 6, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Warren Pumps, LLC (2023)

    …Id.) Mr. Gorton was told that the gaskets contained asbestos. (CCSMF (ECF No. 611) ¶ 56.) He testified that the gaskets were manufactured by Owens-Corning and CertainTeed. (CCSMF (ECF No. 611) ¶ 57.) During the overhaul, Mr…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)

    …IL, James D. Miller, King & Spalding, Washington, DC, Philip McWeeny, David L. Gray, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Toledo, Ohio, for Owens-Illinois, Inc.-Amicus Curiae. Robert G. Vial, Dallas, Texas, Gordon S. Rather, Jr., Little Rock, Arkansas…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rodrigue v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2019)

    …for summary judgment, plaintiffs have either moved to dismiss or settled with the following defendants which were party to the Joint Defendants' motion: FMC Corporation,\[20\] Ingersoll-Rand Company,\[21\] McCarty Corporation,\[22\] Owens-Illinois, Inc.…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …CV-00325-HSG, 2021 WL 1167638, at [\5] (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2021) (quoting Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 958, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d 1203 (Cal. 1997)…

  14. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2018)

    …to whether reasonable consumers could conclude that Pfizer was an apparent manufacture of the asbestos products, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand for further proceedings. WE CONCUR: Johnson, J. Owens, J. Madsen, J. Wiggins…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 20, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Toy Asbestos, 2021)

    …exposed to asbestos from Defendant's products; and (2) this exposure was a substantial factor in causing Mr. Toy's injury and death. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 968-69 (Cal…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 2014 · in the opinion

    Kent v. Warren Pumps, LLC (2014)

    …the defendant (cause-in-fact) and that there is a reasonable medical probability that such exposure was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's injury. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …that the California Supreme Court has not yet determined whether an "every exposure" theory of liability is consistent with the substantial factor test that applies in asbestos cases. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …a substantial factor in causing Mr. Toy's injury and death. See McIndoe, 817 F.3d at 1174 (applying maritime law); see also Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 968-69 (Cal. 1997)…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …A trial is the appropriate means to determine what obligations, if any, each Defendant owes to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs have not shown that they cannot obtain complete relief from any Defendant without the absent parties. Second…

  20. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)

    …Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wn.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wn.2d at 787. \[14\] Lybbert v. Grant…