No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion

    White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    …v. United Fruit Company, 365 U.S. 731, 81 S.Ct. 886, 6 L.Ed.2d 56 (1961); Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation, 385 F.2d 79 (4th Cir. 1967); Ford Motor Company v. Wallenius…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion

    Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)

    …Tunks. Dean Prosser was the Reporter for the Restatement of Torts and the quotation from his treatise parallels Section 402A. The language of the majority in Ford Motor Company v. Thompson is consistent with Shamrock v…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982 · in the opinion

    Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

    …as indicated by the recent single personal injury jury verdict in the amount of $127.8 million, of which $125 million was for punitive damages. (Richard Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., Superior Court, Santa Ana, Cal.…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    …s verdicts if at all possible. See Wagner v. International Harvester Co., 611 F.2d 224 (8th Cir.1979); Hasson v. Ford Motor Co., 19 Cal.3d 530, 138 Cal. Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857 …

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · February 17, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …and alternative liability in Marshall v. Celotex, 651 F.Supp. 389 (E.D.Mich.1987). \[2\] Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 33, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985) ("\[P\]laintiff is entitled…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 30, 1986 · in the opinion

    Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1986)

    …of a reasonable and rational nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury. In Ford Motor Co. v…

  7. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2011)

    …S.W.3d 429, 452-53 (Tenn.Ct.App.2000); Harden v. Danek Med., Inc., 985 S.W.2d 449, 451 (Tenn.Ct.App.1998). North Brothers, relying on Ford Motor Co. v. Wagoner, 183 Tenn.

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 20, 1990 · in the opinion

    Grispo v. Eagle-Picher Indus. (In re Joint E. & S. Dist. New York Asbestos Lit., 1990)

    …worth undertaking at this time, we proceed to consider it. As the military contractor defense exists to promote a federal interest in military procurement, see Sanner v. Ford Motor Co., 144 N.J.Super. 1, 9…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …we are not persuaded that reversible error has been demonstrated or that manifest injustice would result by allowing the verdict to stand. See Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 988 F.2d 573, 582 (5th Cir.1993)…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 27, 1989 · in the opinion

    Dube v. Pittsburgh Corning (1989)

    …768 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir.1985) (same); Ford v. American Motors Corp., 770 F.2d 465 (5th Cir.1985) (decision of postal service not to warn buyers of surplus vehicles of risk of rollovers was…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 31, 1986 · in the opinion

    Knauer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …J. Graham and Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md., for defendant H.K. Porter. Donald A. Krach, F. Ford Loker, and Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Keene Corp. Edward C. Mackie, Glenn W. Trimmer…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · July 30, 1982 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …D. C., Kevin R. McCarthy for Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., Washington, D. C., Francis J. Ford for Armstrong Cork Co., Washington, D. C., John Jude O'Donnell for Unarco Industries, Inc., Washington, D. C., and Paul…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …L. Martin, Gardner M. Duvall, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, Baltimore \[Attorneys for Porter Hayden Company\]), all on brief. B. Ford Davis (Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P., Baltimore, all on brief), William D. Harvard, Warren N…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1984 · in the opinion

    Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    …Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Amatex Corp. Lise Luborsky, Duane, Morris & Heckscher, Philadelphia, Pa., for D.A.R. Industrial Products, Inc. Robert St. Leger Goggin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Johns-Manville Corp., Johns-Manville Sales Corp. Edward J…