No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 2, 2016

    Myers v. Crouse-Hinds Division OF Cooper Industries, Inc. (2016)

    The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the denial of summary judgment to General Electric and Owens-Illinois in the Geyman case and reversed summary judgment for Crouse-Hinds and the other defendants in the Myers case, so…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 8, 2010

    Horn v. A.W. Chesterson Co. (In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2010)

    Ten asbestos cases, brought by plaintiffs represented by the same law firm, were assigned to one New York County judge for trial. Eight of the plaintiffs, alleging mesothelioma, asked the court to consolidate their cases into three groups for joint…

  3. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · June 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2001)

    …Corporation, ACandS, Inc., Rock Wool Manufacturing Co., Inc., The Anchor Packing Company, Rapid American Corporation, Garlock, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Covil Corporation, E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Defendants…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …appropriate. Appellants assert that a determination as to whether there was insufficient knowledge of the manufacturer or of the scientific field in general would have been relevant in order to determine whether the Kent cigarettes, and…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · May 1, 2000 · in the opinion

    Falise v. American Tobacco Co. (2000)

    …from asbestos workers who were likely to be fatally affected by the combined inhalation of the two. A. Asbestos Uses and Production Asbestos is a general term referring to two main varieties of natural, fibrous minerals…

  6. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 22, 1990 · in the opinion

    Hagen v. Rapid American Corp. (1990)

    …512.020 RSMo. 1986. We first address this latter question. The right of appeal exists solely by virtue of statute. Harris v. Union Electric Co., 685 S.W.2d 607, 611 (Mo.App. 1985). Section 512…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 14, 2012 · in the opinion

    Couscouris v. Hatch Grinding Wheels, Inc. (2012)

    …2012. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL GEORGE H. KING, District Judge. Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re: Motion for Remand and for Award of Costs Incurred This matter is before us on…

  8. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion

    McGuire v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …been a strictly personal choice, yet it was a thing of comfort and convenience to himself while he was serving as maintenance man and general custodian and while he was on call at all hours. Therefore…

  9. Court case · Wisconsin Supreme Court · October 27, 1999 · in the opinion

    Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …Wisconsin would not turn a deaf ear to argument that in a particular sort of case the policy reasons [\236] for allowing an exception override the policy reasons for applying the general rule. 236 Patzer v…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …The "minimum contacts" prong of the test can be broken down into two types of personal jurisdiction, specific and general. A state exercises "specific jurisdiction" over a non-resident defendant when the lawsuit arises from or…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    …is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · September 4, 1997 · in the opinion

    In re Celotex Corp. (1997)

    …exposure thereto.... (J.A. 44-45). Rapid's claim against the Celotex bankruptcy estate was principally based upon a written agreement entitled "General Assignment & Assumption of Liabilities," (J.A. 52), wherein Celotex's predecessor in interest…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · April 13, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …regard to either theory. The facts presented in this case show that H & V and Lorillard had a much closer relationship than that of a general component part manufacturer supplying parts to an end product manufacturer…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Rothchild v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984). As a general rule, the Court must "limit\[\] its consideration to the pleadings and exhibits attached thereto" when deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Grossman v. Nationsbank…

  15. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · March 18, 2004 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company (2004)

    …case law above, substituting the foreseeability test, in place of finding the existence of a direct injury, is error. As a general rule, proximate cause requires that both be present " Id. at 236. We agree. ¶18…