11 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion
White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)
…v. United Fruit Company, 365 U.S. 731, 81 S.Ct. 886, 6 L.Ed.2d 56 (1961); Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation, 385 F.2d 79 (4th Cir. 1967); Ford Motor Company v. Wallenius…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 30, 1982 · in the opinion
Murphree v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1982)
…Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 7, 1983 · in the opinion
Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)
…Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 22, 1986 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)
…722 F.2d 1238 (5th Cir.1984), modified and reh'g denied, 727 F.2d 350 (5th Cir.1984); Foster v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 1304, 1309 n. 10 (5th Cir.1980). We note…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 21, 1985 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)
…Inc., 656 F.2d 1147, 1153 (5th Cir.1981); King v. Ford Motor Co., 597 F.2d 436, 445 (5th Cir.1979). We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court. Nothing…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…protection to a rigidly literal class of "users and consumers." In Ford Motor Co. v. Cockrell, 211 So.2d 833 (Miss.1968), a city employee noticed smoke rising from the motor of an unattended city truck…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2011)
…S.W.3d 429, 452-53 (Tenn.Ct.App.2000); Harden v. Danek Med., Inc., 985 S.W.2d 449, 451 (Tenn.Ct.App.1998). North Brothers, relying on Ford Motor Co. v. Wagoner, 183 Tenn.
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion
Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)
…Fetzer Co. v. Dile (9th Cir.1981), 643 F.2d 670; Smith v. Ford Motor Co. (10th Cir.1980), 626 F.2d 784.) In Scott, the lower court permitted plaintiff, through previous undisclosed witnesses, to advance…
-
Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · January 17, 1984 · in the opinion
Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1984)
…second, that such assumption of the risk is a "form of contributory negligence." The first principle finds wide support in the authorities. See Henderson v. Ford Motor Co., 519 S.W.2d 87, 90 (Tex.1974)…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 5, 1984 · in the opinion
Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…Robert E. Scott, Jr., Bruce R. Parker, Daniel W. Whitney, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Donald A. Krach, F. Ford Loker, Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Michael B. Mann, Merriman & Mann, James R. Eyler, Miles & Stockbridge, Michael E. Marr, Baltimore…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · July 30, 1982 · in the opinion
Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)
…D. C., Kevin R. McCarthy for Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., Washington, D. C., Francis J. Ford for Armstrong Cork Co., Washington, D. C., John Jude O'Donnell for Unarco Industries, Inc., Washington, D. C., and Paul…