No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 21, 1996 · in the opinion

    Holbrook v. Lykes Bros. SS Co., Inc. (1996)

    …BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY; Combustion Engineering, Inc.; Foster-Wheeler Energy Corporation; The General Electric Co.; Keene Corporation, Independently and as Successor in Interest to Ehret Magnesia Manufacturing Company, Baldwin-Hill Company and Baldwin-Ehret-Hill, Inc.; Owens…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 13, 1988

    Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. US (1988)

    …the United States under General Agency Agreements marine engineer thirteen vessels owned by five shipowner defendants, including Sea-Land 1949-1978; seaman vessels owned and/or operated for the United States under General Agency Agreements 1943…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 8, 1987

    Swogger v. Waterman SS Corp. (1987)

    …contribution and indemnity are not barred by New York's General Obligations Law. Maritime Law and Navy Ships Worksites: engine rooms of some 13 vessels marine engineer engine rooms of some 13 vessels more than 35…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · October 3, 1989

    Swogger v. Waterman SS Corp. (1989)

    …on the high seas, admiralty law rather than state law applies to the related third-party contribution and indemnity claims, so New York General Obligations Law § 15-108 does not bar contribution. Fault, Apportionment and Settlement…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · October 1, 1996 · in the opinion

    In re Waterman SS Corp. (1996)

    …on MALC. An even more persuasive basis for placing the burden of proof on MALC is the general rule that when the true facts relating to a dispute are particularly within the knowledge of one party…