50 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020
Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)
…Owens-Illinois was liable for Dr. Gaddy's asbestos exposure at International Paper. A jury verdict may be set aside under Rule 50(b) only if no reasonable jury could have found otherwise. Testimony that Owens…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020
Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…may be treated as fraudulently joined when procedural rules (waiver, and Illinois limits on reconsideration with late evidence) leave no reasonable possibility of reinstating the claim; the common-defense exception does not apply where the reason…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 2, 2016
Weis v. Dsm Copolymer, Inc. (2016)
The wife and children of Joseph Weis sued DSM Copolymer and other companies in Louisiana state court. They alleged he developed asbestos-related mesothelioma and died in 2014 after being exposed while working as a maintenance worker at DSM's Baton…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · July 16, 2020
Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2020)
Charles Corley and his wife Myra sued dozens of companies that allegedly supplied asbestos-containing products that caused his malignant mesothelioma. The opinion says he used the products in the Navy and later as a self-employed mechanic and…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 13, 1998 · in the opinion
Beaudrie v. Anchor Packing Co. (1998)
…Inc., John Johnson Company, Keene Corporation, M.H. Detrick Company, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Raymark Industries and Standard Fuel Engineering Company, Defendants, and Silicosis and Dust Disease Fund and Detroit…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion
Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)
In Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 604 A.2d 47, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 871, 113 S.Ct. 204, 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992) (hereinafter Armstrong II), the Court of Appeals first…
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007 · in the opinion
In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)
…supra at 233. The court held that because there was no relationship between the defendant and the defendant's employee's wife, no duty could be imposed. In Adams v Owens-Illinois, Inc, 119 Md App…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)
…subd. (a); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 958 (Rutherford).) "\[I\]f supported by the evidence," a jury must apportion fault against parties and nonparties found responsible for the plaintiff's injury…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
…a negligent failure to warn action." May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp., 446 Md. 1, 25 n.22 (2015) (citation omitted). In Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, supra, the Court noted that Professors Henderson and Twerski …
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)
…Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir.1986) (upholding Maryland's substantial contributing factor standard in an asbestosis case); Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 8, 2016 · in the opinion
Lepore v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. (2016)
…McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1098, 1103 (McGonnell); see Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977.) Direct evidence of exposure is not required; rather, the plaintiff…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)
…exposed to asbestos-containing products from the Rossmoor project with such frequency, regularity, and proximity as to satisfy the causation standard articulated in Rutherford \[v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford)\], Hernandez \[v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion
Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)
…asbestos products in Indiana and California. He contends that the trial court erroneously split the cause of action into California and Indiana components, contrary to statements by our Supreme Court in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 12, 2003 · in the opinion
Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)
…Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp; Kelly Moore Paint Company; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing; North American Refractories Co.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Proko Industries; Quigley Company; Riley Stoker Corp.; The Synkoloid Company; T…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Loupe v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (2016)
…C. & Rebecca Abbott Zotti, Frilot L.L.C.. Uniroyal, Inc., Defendant, represented by Forrest Ren Wilkes, Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC. Owens-Illinois, Inc., represented by Forrest Ren Wilkes, Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC, Walter G. Watkins, III…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002 · in the opinion
Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)
…its discretion. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corporation v. Powell, supra. Reversible Error, Directed Verdict, and Illinois Law Having found error, we must next determine if the error is reversible. TEX. R.APP.P. 44.1. An error…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2008 · in the opinion
Kummer v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)
…has been adopted by a majority of federal jurisdictions and many state courts, Robertson; Jones v. Ownes-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712 (4th Cir.1995)(applying North Carolina law); Slaughter v. Southern Talc Co.…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001
Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)
Loyd Herring worked for Cummins Engine Company in Columbus, Indiana, from 1942 until he retired in 1978, and the opinion says he was exposed there to various forms of asbestos and asbestos-containing products. He was diagnosed with malignant…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 19, 1997
Potter v. Patterson (1997)
The widow and children of John Potter sued Mine Safety Appliances (MSA) and many other companies and individuals. They alleged he died of mesothelioma from asbestos exposure over many years of work for NOPSI. The plaintiffs settled with MSA alone…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Luna v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…at 334. Evidence of the mere physical presence of asbestos-containing material is insufficient to find a manufacturer liable to a plaintiff. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2003-0248 (La.App. 1st Cir. 4/2…