8 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 8, 2018
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Fairbanks, Ford and Goodyear. A party seeking to supplement an expert report after summary judgment must show good cause or excusable neglect, and plaintiffs who never sought leave before judgment was entered did not do so…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 20, 2018 · in the opinion
Clayton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)
…b)(2); Heliotrope Gen., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 189 F.3d 971, 981 n.18 (9th Cir. 1999). A Rule 12(c) motion challenges the sufficiency of the opposing party's pleadings, and the court…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)
…strict liability analysis. Common sense tells us that the pumps were what Respondents sold to the Navy, and the gaskets and packing are included within that product. We have studied Ford Motor Co. v. Wood and…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)
…plaintiffs' assertion on appeal, the case had not been tried or submitted to the jury on the theory that Ford had a duty to warn about hazards in replacement brakes and clutches. (Ford Motor v. Wood…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion
O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)
…or raw material and therefore are in a better position to guarantee that the component or raw material is suitable for their particular applications." \[Citations.\]' (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. \[(1998)\] 60 Cal.App.4th 1541…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…and sold by others. The circuit court granted the pump makers summary judgment. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It held that under its earlier decision in Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, and following courts in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Pieno v. Crosby Valve (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Cross Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. The Fairbanks Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Timothy…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Kardos v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc. (2019)
…as to the causation of decedent's disease by the product of each particular defendant." Vanaman, supra at 607. See also Rost v. Ford Company, 637 Pa. 625, 151 A.3d 1032 (2016) (emphasizing that "frequent…