No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

20 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 2, 2004 · in the opinion

    Torrejon v. Mobil Oil Co. (2004)

    …Torrejon was uncertain as to the length of time he was there. • General Electric — worked on boilers and turbines and the heating and cooling system. • Colonial House (a hotel) in Las Vegas — 1959 to early 1960…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 16, 1991 · in the opinion

    Fibreboard Corp. v. Pool (1991)

    …1969). Quantifying probability, it means a more than fifty percent chance. See Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Underwriters v. Gary Douglas Electric, 48 Ohio App.2d 319, 357 N.E.2d 388, 392 (1974). Dr. J.D. Britton…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 1998 · in the opinion

    Re' v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …J., dissents with reasons. BYRNES, Judge, dissenting with reasons. When the Louisiana Supreme Court in Jordan v. Central Louisiana Electric Co., Inc., 95-1270 (La.6/23/95), 656 So.2d 988, 989 held that the…

  4. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983 · in the opinion

    Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)

    …2d 199, 214-15, 90 S.Ct. 1583, 1595-96 (Black, J., dissenting); General Dynamics Corp., Electric Boat Division, v. Benefits Review Board (2d Cir.1977), 565 F.2d 208, 212; Williams v. Ray (1978), 146…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · April 3, 1992 · in the opinion

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …the court must consider all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. White v. Westinghouse Electric Company, 862 F.2d 56, 59 (3d Cir.1988). Evidentiary issues Defendants contend that: (1) plaintiff…

  6. Product picture · Product Pictures

    Label: RED TOP FIRECODE PLASTER (UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY) (2)

    …scan of a bag label for Red Top Firecode Plaster by United States Gypsum Company, with a USG logo and flame illustrations, beside a separate 'General Description' section heading graphic, on a page stamped Exhibit 214.

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee · January 9, 1984 · in the opinion

    Johnson County, Tenn. v. US Gypsum Co. (1984)

    While it is true that contractors who perform construction work for the state operated universities are not protected by general statutes of limitation, see Dunn v. W.F. Jameson and Sons, Inc., 569 S.W.2d…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 20, 2001 · in the opinion

    Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. US Gypsum Co. (2001)

    …is no need, therefore, to apply standards which pinpoint the date of a plaintiff's injury in a general claim for asbestos damages; the plaintiff has already specified its injury in its complaint. Prudential did not…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · July 7, 1993 · in the opinion

    Behrendt v. GAF Corp. (1993)

    …fishing, woodworking. Mr. Behrendt's pain symptoms eventually led to a diagnosis of mesothelioma in December 1990. He was taken to the Emergency Room at Community General Osteopathic Hospital, Harrisburg, on December 23, 1990 with a…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)

    …requirements of predominance and superiority. In In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation, 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.) \[Hereinafter GM Trucks\], cert. denied sub nom. General Motors Corp. v…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989 · in the opinion

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    …theory of non-identification liability is acceptable in New Jersey. \[9\] The court "reserve\[d\] decision on the general appropriateness of including products with different degrees of risk in a market-share analysis." 116 N.J…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 12, 1996 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Keene Corp. (1996)

    …pleadings shall be according to the rules." 735 ILCS 5/2-201(a) (West 1994). General jurisdiction is invoked in the trial court when an action is filed and a summons is issued and served upon…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1992 · in the opinion

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …112 S.Ct. 1671, 118 L.Ed.2d 391 (New Rule 238 withstands constitutional challenges on due process and equal protection grounds.); Leonard v. General Motors Corp., Civil No. 88-2380, slip op. at 5 (E…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion

    Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)

    …regardless of their motive for inspecting such records. Thus, the press has no greater right of access than does the general public, and more importantly, an intervenor who is also a litigant in a collateral proceeding…

  15. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · February 19, 2003 · in the opinion

    In re Usg Corp. (2003)

    …In In re USG Corporation, one sees these general truths played out in detail. The debtors argues that "\[t\]he vast majority of asbestos personal injury suits filed today are meritless nonmalignant claims of minor pleural…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · May 2, 1991 · in the opinion

    Harding v. Proko Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …find Kansas or Texas law to be applicable to the plaintiff's claims. Section 6(2) of the Second Restatement identifies seven general considerations which are relevant to the resolution of a given conflict of laws…

  17. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    In re ACandS, Inc. (2011)

    …filed),\[12\] or a ballot is filed with respect to the plan of reorganization,\[13\] the details of the putative creditor's interests have been kept from general public view to [\98] retain and protect privacy…

  18. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 21, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re the Flintkote Company (2012)

    …depends upon (i) whether under state law a corporation is permitted to bring an alter ego claim; and (ii) "whether the claim is a general claim that is common to all creditors." Rosener v. Majestic Mgmt.…

  19. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 21, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Flintkote Co. (2012)

    …depends upon (i) whether under state law a corporation is permitted to bring an alter ego claim; and (ii) "whether the claim is a general claim that is common to all creditors." Rosener v. Majestic Mgmt.…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 8, 1990 · in the opinion

    Barnett v. City of Yonkers (1990)

    …News 1426, 1428. In the Asbestos Act, Congress directed the Attorney General of the United States to ascertain the feasibility of recovering "from any person determined" to be liable the costs of detecting, removing, and replacing…