No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

27 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · March 30, 2022

    Ripple v. CBS Corporation (2022)

    Richard Counter was diagnosed with mesothelioma in May 2015 and married his longtime partner in July 2015. He sued several companies, alleging he inhaled asbestos from the 1950s through the 1990s during military service at sea, at industrial plants…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 12, 2010

    Bush v. Eaton Corporation (2010)

    Oretha Mae Bush sued Eaton Corporation, its plant supervisor James Kinsner, and several other companies in Kentucky state court. She alleged negligence and strict liability for exposing her to asbestos fibers and causing mesothelioma. She died in…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 5, 2016

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    Charles Arbogast, Jr., and his wife Barbara sued twenty-seven companies, alleging that as manufacturers or distributors of various products they exposed him to asbestos and caused his mesothelioma. The complaint raised strict liability, negligence,…

  4. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 15, 2014

    Estate OF Gregovich v. Auer Steel & Heating Supply (2014)

    George Gregovich alleged that asbestos from products made or supplied by sixteen defendants caused his mesothelioma. He died about eighteen months after filing suit, and his estate and a guardian of his person and estate continued the case. The…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 16, 2016

    George v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …County state court. Even assuming consent-by-registration survives Daimler, Pennsylvania's registration statute limits general jurisdiction to acts occurring during the period of registration, so a registration that began after the alleged injury does not…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion

    Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)

    …Speck was to any work done on or around a General Electric product or product of another defendant\[,\]" and has "no idea" about the quantity of asbestos fibers to which Speck may have been exposed by…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Niedert v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2022)

    …INC., AURORA PUMP COMPANY, BLACKMER, BURNHAM, LLC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY, CRANE CO., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC (DELAWARE), GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC (NORTH CAROLINA), GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC, GOODYEAR CANADA, INC, GOULDS PUMPS LLC, ITT…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)

    …worked on: Cutler-Hammer, Squire D., Siemens, Ellis, Allen-Bradley, Westinghouse, and General Electric. Id. at 101:8-22. Eaton has liability for Cutler-Hammer products. \[See ECF No. 384 p.2\]. Watson testified that he…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 29, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation Charlevoix v. CBS Corporation (2016)

    …2013, a copy of which is available on the court's website, http://www.ded.uscourts.gov. \[1\] CBS Corporation is sued as a successor-in-interest to Westinghouse Electric Corporation ("Westinghouse"). (D.1. 147 at…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018

    Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)

    …Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1953-1957; boilermaker, truck mechanic, and general helper Thatcher Glass Elmira 1957-1996; fireman USS Des Moines 1957-1961; boiler maintenance mechanic Happauge School District 1976-1982; welder USS Mindoro 1948-1952…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 27, 2023 · in the opinion

    Servedio v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2023)

    …OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC, PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER), REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC. FORMERLY KNOWN AS, SLANT/FIN CORPORATION, U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL), UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WEIL-McLAIN, A…

  12. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Rogers (2017)

    …In 1980, Goodyear sampled materials. In 1983, Goodyear took six samples from maintenance electricians. Over half of the total samples were taken in 1985, after asbestos abatement efforts had begun. Goodyear trained its employee Ray Jackson…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 23, 2013

    McCloskey v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2013)

    …cut and punched gaskets from sheets stamped "Goodyear", which created dust, and that he believed they contained asbestos because he was told so and it was general knowledge. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada, Inc…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 20, 2019

    Temperino v. Amchem Prods. (2019)

    …cigarettes a day for about 37 years. Honda moved for summary judgment, arguing plaintiff could not prove general or specific causation. Several other defendants asked the court to bar plaintiff's medical experts and, if successful…

  16. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Richards v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc. (2019)

    51, 51-52 (2008) ("Beyond general and specific causation, an additional causation issue arises when multiple defendants are responsible for exposing the plaintiff to a harmful substance. The most common example is a plaintiff who contracts…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · March 23, 2023

    Riegler v. Carlisle Companies, Incorporated (2023)

    …Staggs's specific causation opinion, and granted in part and denied in part the motions to exclude: Ewing's opinion and Staggs's general causation opinion were admitted. Under Rule 702, a medical expert's specific…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Kofler v. AW Chesteron (2009)

    …Inc. ceased manufacturing asbestos-containing gasket material in 1969 and 1973 respectively. Goodyear's General Counsel asserts that Goodyear stopped manufacturing asbestos-containing gaskets before 1974. (Responses to Plaintiffs' First Standard Set of Interrogatories by G…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Colvin v. Eaton Corporation (2019)

    …in which the party responds but the response is incomplete or otherwise objectionable. Rules Commentary at 436-37.\[3\] As a general matter, the first step in obtaining a judicial resolution of a discovery dispute is…

  20. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2005)

    …Earth, including consideration of the chemistry of its constituent materials. These general definitions indicate that knowledge or understanding of chemical compositions and compounds is required in the scientific specialties of geology and geochemistry. Considering Dr. De…