No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

24 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · April 12, 2013

    Stallings v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation (2013)

    …keeping the case in federal court on General Electric's and Crane Company's federal officer removal. A government contractor may remove under the federal officer removal statute if it was acting under a federal agency…

  2. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 4, 2008 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Union Carbide Corporation (2008)

    …Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, f/k/a/Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Certainteed Corporation; C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman, Inc.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; Fraser's Boiler Service, Inc.; General Electric Company; Georgia-Pacific Corporation…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 3, 2008 · in the opinion

    Gregory v. Beazer East (2008)

    …Corporation, Chicago Bridge and Iron, Commonwealth Edison, Foseco, Inc., Garlock Sealing Technologies, General Electric, Ingersoll Rand, John Crane, Inc., Lincoln Electric Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Pittsburgh Metals Purifying, a/k/a Treesdale, Inc., Reynolds Aluminum…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · January 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Bondex International, Inc. (2014)

    …An Ohio Corporation; CBS CORPORATION, A Delaware Corporation (Successor By Merger With CBS Corporation F/K/A Westinghouse Electric Corporation)Formerly Known As Viacom Inc.; GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, A Georgia Corporation (Sued Individually And As Successor…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assoc. (2012)

    …v. Westinghouse Electric Corp, 89 NY2d 955 (1997) (internal citations omitted). Here, the evidence showed the following: Mr. Konstantin worked at two construction sites from 1975 to 1977 where TLC's predecessor was the general contractor…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 2, 2006 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Benjamin (2006)

    …default on another person."\[7\] Binnix v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 593 F.Supp. 1180, 1182 (Md. 1984) (quoting Stewart v. United Electric Light and Power Co., 104 Md. 332, 343, 65 A. 49, 53 (1906))…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Stallings v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation (2015)

    …526 U.S. 137, 147-49 (1999) (applying Daubert's general principles to the expert matters discussed in Rule 702). First, the Court must determine "whether the experts' testimony reflects \scientific knowledge,' whether their findings are…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Tishman Liquidating Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2014)

    …but then Dr. Moline gave general testimony concerning the pain associated with mesothelioma without distinguishing between the two men. Initially, the issue of consolidation is properly before us and we reject the Konstantin plaintiff's contention…

  9. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016

    Konstantin v. Tishman Liquidating Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)

    Dave John Konstantin worked as a carpenter in the 1970s at two Manhattan construction sites where Tishman Liquidating Corporation (TLC) was the general contractor. He worked near other workers who sanded and swept asbestos-containing joint…

  10. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)

    If the plaintiff proves general causation with reliable scientific evidence that approximately 400 milligrams of the medication can cause death in children, the plaintiff will be able to prove specific causation in at least two ways…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)

    Maddox's opinion is insufficient as to specific causation. Id. at 839. Here, appellees endeavor to rely on material practice simulation studies performed by their general causation expert, William Longo, Ph.D., a material scientist. Dr…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2011

    Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assocs. (2011)

    …defendant, not for later exposure as an employee of a different employer. Whether a general contractor controlled the work site is a fact question that can defeat summary judgment. Premises Owner Liability; Employer and Contractor Liability…

  13. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 10, 2013

    Greer v. Ace Hardware Corporation (2013)

    …summary judgment, the plaintiff must produce evidence identifying a specific asbestos-containing product the defendant made or supplied and to which the plaintiff was exposed; general assertions that "some" products contained asbestos, or guesswork, are not…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    …we agree with Ford's contention that "case reports" and other anecdotal evidence are not probative of either general or actual causation,\[14\] but we must point out that Ford severely overstates the strength of its…

  15. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion

    Burns v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    … John Crane, Inc.; DAP, Inc.; Fibreboard Corporation; GAF Corporation; General Refractories Company; Harbison-Walker Refractories Company; Harcros Chemicals, Inc., as Successor-in-Interest to Thompson-Hayward Chemical Company; Kaiser Refractories, A Division of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical…

  16. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 19, 2014 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. 640 Third Ave. Assoc. (2014)

    …or other misconduct of an adverse party. In its reply memorandum, Tishman cites the "general interests of justice," as additional grounds for granting the subpoenas. Tishman's motion is primarily based on the contention that plaintiff…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. 640 Third Ave. Assoc. (2014)

    … In its reply memorandum, Tishman cites the "general interests of justice," as additional grounds for granting the subpoenas. Tishman's motion is primarily based on the contention that plaintiff withheld discovery during the pendency of the…

  19. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2009)

    …address the standards pertaining to relation back, and then proceed to apply those standards to the case before us. Relation Back in General Relation back is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) which provides…