8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016
Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)
Vernon Rublee died of mesothelioma in 2015. He had worked as a machinist at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard from 1965 to 1980, where other workers mixed and applied asbestos-containing refractory products called Insulag and Panelag around the steam…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 29, 2018 · in the opinion
Brandes v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2018)
…INC., CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERCIVES, INC.; and SABERHAGEN HOLDINGS, INC., Respondents. No…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 14, 1998 · in the opinion
In re Ethyl Corp. (1998)
…184, 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995); see also Friendly, Federal Jurisdiction: A General View 120 (1973) (condemning "blackmail settlements"), quoted in In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc., 51 F.3d at 1298. On the other…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 11, 2011 · in the opinion
Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2011)
…BOILER COMPANY, a division of AMERICAN RADIATOR & STANDARD SANITARY COMPANY; TRICO CONTRACTING, INC., TRANSALTA CENTRALIA GENERATION, LLC; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO.; WRIGHT SCHUCHART HARBOR CO., WEYERHAUSER COMPANY; ZURN INDUSTRIES LLC; GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC.;…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)
…102 S.Ct. 2579, 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982)). \[12\] The express reservation test is similar to the rule of general retroactivity discussed by this court in pre-Robinson decisions. Haines, 87 Wash.2d at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 7, 2004 · in the opinion
Hernandez v. Todd Shipyards Corporation (2004)
…77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983), will not provide a basis for removal. As a general rule, absent diversity jurisdiction, a case will not be removable if the complaint does not affirmatively allege a federal claim…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion
Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)
…bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 22, 2007 · in the opinion
Ballenger v. Agco Corporation (2007)
…S. 423 (1999), It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the claim in suit. To…