No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

18 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 17, 2022 · in the opinion

    Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls (2022)

    …24, 2014). In Vedros, the plaintiff filed suit against multiple defendants in state court, and three defendants, General Electric, Foster-Wheeler, and Westinghouse, subsequently removed the case pursuant to the federal officer removal statute. Id. at…

  2. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Brezonick v. AW Chesteron Company (2015)

    …to be pasteurized. A lot of them had to be changed. Just general maintenance of the whole machine. Repacking required John to remove old gaskets and rope packing from valves, clean the valves, fit new gaskets…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002 · in the opinion

    Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)

    …In that case, the court concluded that repair and replacement costs incurred by the insured on account of damage to electrical transformers caused by a design defect were not "ensuing losses." Id. In support of its…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 8, 2017

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    …52 and topic 40 (pre-1972 only) and denying the general dust and post-employment topics. Rule 30(b)(6) topics must be relevant and proportional; general 'dust' topics were cumulative of the asbestos-specific topics…

  6. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014

    Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)

    …it applies. It applies only if the insured was substantially certain that a known failure of its product would cause the plaintiff's injury, not merely aware of general disease hazards. Choice of Law; Insurance Coverage;…

  7. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · September 12, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Viking Pump, Inc. (2016)

    As a general principle, a clause restricting assignment does not in any way limit the policyholder's power to make an assignment of the rights under the policy — consisting of the right to receive the proceeds…

  8. Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)

    § 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…

  9. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)

    …and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. American Re-Insurance Company (2010)

    …pay "all sums" up to the policy limit, which the insured shall become liable to pay as damages, and not just for damages that occur during the policy period (Aerojet-General Corp. v Transport Indem. Co.…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · April 25, 2017 · in the opinion

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    …deMahy & Angela Jacketti O'Brien, Louisiana Department of Justice - Office of Attorney General. RULING AND ORDER ERIN WILDER-DOOMES, Magistrate Judge. Before the court is a Motion for Destructive Testing\[1\] filed by defendant Pilkington North…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2020 · in the opinion

    Textron, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company (2020)

    …both parties) to obtain a declaration that Travelers owed a duty to defend and indemnify in the Esters action under a series of Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies issued to Textron by Travelers from January 1…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 24, 2012 · in the opinion

    US Fid. & Guaranty Co. v. American Re-Ins. Co. (2012)

    …brevity, we presume familiarity with the case, and provide a general overview of the facts directly relevant to this appeal. The Underlying Asbestos Claims In the 1950s and 1960s, Western Asbestos was a company that sold…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · April 21, 2017 · in the opinion

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    …represented by Angela Jacketti O'Brien, Louisiana Department of Justice - Office of Attorney General. RULING AND ORDER ERIN WILDER-DOOMES, Magistrate Judge. Before the court is Plaintiffs' Second Revised Joint Rule 25(a)(1) Motion for…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corporation (2009)

    …issued, described Congoleum's ongoing efforts at filing a pre-packaged bankruptcy. (See Coverage Decision, A1297.) A general meeting with GHR and several claimants' representatives, including Claimants' Counsel, was held in New York on November 19…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)

    …2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corp. (2009)

    …issued, described Congoleum's ongoing efforts at filing a prepackaged bankruptcy. (See Coverage Decision, A1297.) A general meeting with GHR and several claimants' representatives, including Claimants' Counsel, was held in New York on November 19, 2002…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Perez v. Century Indemnity Co. (2024)

    …its van or stepped inside. We agree with plaintiffs that the brakes remained in Universal's possession as they lay untouched in the back of its van. (See General Casualty Co. of America v. Azteca Films…