12 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991
Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)
…causation. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Fear of Cancer and Medical Monitoring; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Unarco (Union Asbestos & Rubber Company) Bloomington plant; UNARCO plant, Bloomington, Bloomington UNARCO employee (pipe department) UNARCO plant, Bloomington Bloomington…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion
White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)
…with Panacon Corporation, which was successor by merger of Briggs Manufacturing Company and Philip Carey Corporation; Unarco Industries, Inc., formerly known as Union Asbestos and Rubber Company; H. K. Porter Company, Thermoid Division, a Delaware Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · January 14, 1980 · in the opinion
Mooney v. Fibreboard Corp. (1980)
…of Borel precludes the defendants from relitigating whether asbestos products are defective and unreasonably dangerous within the meaning of section 402A of the Restatement. Simmons v. Union News Co., 341 F.2d 531, 533 (6th Cir…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · July 30, 1982 · in the opinion
Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)
…Blannie S. WILSON, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased, Appellant, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, etal. No. 81-2019. Argued April 20, 1982. Decided July 30, 1982. United States Court of Appeals, District…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · March 6, 1981 · in the opinion
Locke v. Johns-Manville (1981)
…Construction Corp., supra, a 1948 explosion stemming from an improper gas-pipe union caused the property damage sued for. The defective gas line was installed by defendant's subcontractor not later than 1943. In holding the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…supplemented, and the entity is not irrevocably bound to what the fairly prepared and candid designated deponent happens to remember during the testimony." Snapp v. United Transp. Union, 889 F.3d 1088, 1103-04 (9th Cir…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983 · in the opinion
Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)
…11.) A "change in that construction by this court would amount to amending the statute," and this court has acknowledged that "\[t\]he power to accomplish this does not lie in the courts." Union Electric Co…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 19, 1982 · in the opinion
Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982)
…LTD., FORMERLY CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD., JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, UNARCO INDUSTRIES, FORMERLY KNOWN AS UNION ASBESTOS & RUBBER COMPANY; EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., AND OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND JOHN DOE CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · June 3, 1985 · in the opinion
Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)
…Cir.1984); Donovan v. Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Intern. Union and Its Local 423, 718 F.2d 1341 (5th Cir.1983); Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581 (5th Cir.1983); Hargrave…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 27, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…factor test, the plaintiff must demonstrate "a high enough level of exposure that an inference that the asbestos was a substantial factor in the injury is more than conjectural." Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 1993 · in the opinion
Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (1993)
…this case, knew the health hazards associated with the inhalation of asbestos fibers; that he embarked upon a strategy to use this information to benefit Owens-Corning during negotiations with its labor unions; and that, when…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · February 7, 1995 · in the opinion
Castor v. US (1995)
…have opposed the motion to dismiss in unison and the cases have been consolidated for the purpose of resolving the United States' motion. The plaintiffs have been appropriately notified of the nature of the United States…