No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “Reaction Department”

  1. Company document · JM Litigation Chronology · March 2, 1979

    Johns-Manville Board of Directors Minutes on Asbestos Litigation (1979)

    …Ohio, and a bill to have school ceilings tested. On May 3 he reported "favorable reaction" from employees, customers and others to the asbestos section of the annual report, and described a telex the company sent…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Wehmeier v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …On redirect, Abrams stated that, assuming (1) Cochran worked with amosite asbestos in the pipe department at the plant; and (2) Manville delivered 325 tons of chrysotile asbestos to the plant, Cochran could have inhaled some…

  3. Film · Films · 1970

    Asbestos: Where It Came From and Where It Is Used

    …extremely high temperatures. It inhibits certain types of chemical reaction and is extremely flexible and durable. All of these qualities combine to make asbestos especially suitable for a wide variety of demanding uses. Asbestos is the…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 31, 1986 · in the opinion

    Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …notion that certain activities that create danger must, regardless of their reasonableness, "pay \[their\] own way in the event \[they\] actually cause\[\] damage\[\] to others." Berg v. Reaction Motors Div., 37 N.J. 396, 410 (1962)…

  5. Film · Films · 1958

    A Hundred Years of Roofing Experience (1958)

    …s immersion of all samples. As you can see, Aquadam is stable in its reaction to water immersion and remains unchanged after a year's test. Commercial dead level asphalt show a distinct change in characteristics…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · January 27, 1984 · in the opinion

    Doe v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    …Perhaps, even more pertinent is the reaction of the trial courts. In dealing with the precise dilemma faced by appellant herein, the Honorable Lois Forer of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia has stated: The…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · November 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990)

    …Asbestos fibers, once inhaled, remain in place in the lung, causing a tissue reaction that is slowly progressive and irreversible. Typically, the disease does not manifest itself until years after initial exposure to asbestos fibers. The…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 3, 1982 · in the opinion

    Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)

    …24 Wayne L.Rev. 1641 (1978) (British reaction to first breath rule announced in Cartledge). Other jurisdictions have viewed subjecting the plaintiff to exposure as a continuing tort and have adopted what may be called the…

  9. Court case · Minnesota Supreme Court · May 14, 1982 · in the opinion

    DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. (1982)

    …over recent articles carried in local and national newspapers concerning mesothelioma and stated that "unwise treatment of research data in public discussions could cause reactions which were not justified by the state of scientific knowledge." \ \ \ \ \ \ Industry…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · June 3, 1985 · in the opinion

    Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

    …cumulative. Because inhaled fibers are not all exhaled, but some remain in the lungs and cause reactions there, the later inhalation of added amounts will cause injury that might not have occurred had exposure ceased. There…