- Organization: William E. Neeld, Jr., M.D.
- Organization: E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
- Clear filters
6 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · June 11, 2001 · in the opinion
Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2001)
…Corporation, ACandS, Inc., Rock Wool Manufacturing Co., Inc., The Anchor Packing Company, Rapid American Corporation, Garlock, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Covil Corporation, E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Defendants…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · November 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Matthews v. EI DU Pont DE Nemours and Company (2018)
…Section 42-1-400 provides an exception to the general rule by imposing upon an owner or upstream employer liability for the payment of compensation benefits to worker who is not directly employed by the owner…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · January 30, 2004
Roca v. EI du Pont de Nemours and Co. (2004)
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court's summary judgment for DuPont, General Motors, DaimlerChrysler and Rhone-Poulenc, holding that Roca waived his Section 343 claim by not raising it in his opening brief. An…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 23, 1983 · in the opinion
Nutt v. AC & S., Inc. (1983)
…claims of mental anguish asserted by the plaintiff-wives are alleged in the amended complaints in broad and general language but are actually of two distinct types: mental anguish resulting from the witnessing of the physical…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 22, 1988 · in the opinion
Millison v. EI du Pont de Nemours (1988)
…Ed. 610, 617 (1939); U.S. v. Trotter, 529, F.2d 806 (3d Cir.1976); State v. General Restoration Co., 42 N.J. 366, 375 (1964); State v. Sherwin, 127 N.J. Super. 370 (App.Div…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 22, 2015 · in the opinion
In re EI DU Pont DE Nemours and Company (2015)
…a preponderance of the evidence or even affirmative evidence, because to require such would incorrectly shift the burden of proof. Clophus v. General Motors Corp., 769 S.W.2d 669, 670 (Tex. App.-Houston \[14th Dist.…