No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · February 2, 2018

    Coury v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …keeping the case in federal court under the federal officer removal statute for General Electric and CBS. A settlement-related email from a plaintiff's side can be an "other paper" under 28 U.S.C…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 28, 2022

    Pritt v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    The court denied General Electric's motion to exclude plaintiffs' industrial hygiene expert Dr. Tsai and denied as moot its motion to exclude Capt. Burger. It granted GE summary judgment on the Navy-service claims, denied…

  3. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    Vernon Rublee died of mesothelioma in 2015. He had worked as a machinist at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard from 1965 to 1980, where other workers mixed and applied asbestos-containing refractory products called Insulag and Panelag around the steam…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of the Virgin Islands · July 14, 2023

    Susino EX rel. Estate OF Decedent Susino v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    Carmela Susino sued on her own behalf and for the estate of her father, Luciano Susino, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. She brought wrongful death and survival claims against Overseas Shipholding Group (OSG), the Hess companies and many…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 5, 2019

    Klopman-Baerselman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    Eric Klopman-Baerselman, as personal representative of the estate of Rudie Klopman-Baerselman, sued Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and other companies in federal court in Washington. The suit alleged that Rudie died of mesothelioma caused by…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · October 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Klopman-Baerselman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …Rubin, SOHA & LANG PS & Todd N. Wade, HAWKINS PARNELL & YOUNG LLP, pro hac vice. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation & General Electric Company, a New York corporation, Defendants, represented by Christopher S. Marks, TANENBAUM KEALE…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 17, 2019 · in the opinion

    Knudsen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's product and that the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a manufacturer's name, with no detail on where…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion

    Vocciante v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …Id. at ¶ 28) Accordingly, plaintiffs assert claims for strict liability, negligence, false representation, violation of the Jones Act, violation of general maritime law, loss of consortium, wrongful death, and seek, inter alia, punitive damages. (Id. at…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · November 30, 2020 · in the opinion

    Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …Daubert, 509 U.S. at 594-95. In general, the expert's opinion must be based on principles, techniques, or theories that are generally accepted in his or her profession and must reflect something more than…