No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · May 8, 2024 · in the opinion

    Beverage v. Alcoa, Inc. (2024)

    …226 (noting land can have multiple possessors). We are not persuaded by Alcoa's claim that failing to modify its general duty of care as a land possessor will lead to a drastic spike in lawsuits…

  2. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion

    Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company (2008)

    By requiring judges to determine general foreseeability, the majority's opinion forces trial judges to base their decision-making on a razor thin distinction and encourages judges to make factual determinations relevant to breach of duty…

  3. Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. (2018)

    First, whether it falls under the general auspices of "negligence" or "liability," both the Family and the dissent are in fact using cases and Restatement sections premised on foreseeability to create a new duty. Second, by…

  4. Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · December 15, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hendrix v. Alcoa, Inc. (2016)

    …section 35 of Act 796, the legislature expressly provided as follows: The Seventy-Ninth General Assembly realizes that the Arkansas Workers' Compensation statutes must be revised and amended from time to time. Unfortunately many of the…

  5. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · March 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Beverage v. Alcoa, Inc. (2021)

    …immunizes defendants against liability for exposure to asbestos or silica products that were "made or sold by a third party." It contains no general grant of immunity for "premises owners" or "asbestos product suppliers." That aside…