No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Pistone v. American Biltrite, Inc. (2018)

    …to AZROCK INDUSTRIES, INC.; FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION; GARDNER INDUSTRIES, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. ind. and as sue. to (F/K/A ALLIED SIGNAL) AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BENDIX CORPORATION…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 14, 2019

    Linsky v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …cross-claims, finding fact issues on general and specific causation. A defendant cannot win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiff's proof and must show its product did not contribute to the illness. Conflicting…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 25, 2020

    Lamenta v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …the plaintiffs' claims and all crossclaims against it, because the plaintiffs did not raise a fact issue on general or specific causation. In a toxic tort case, expert opinion must show both that the toxin can…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 25, 2019

    Gallagher v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …the plaintiffs' claims against it go forward. A defendant cannot get summary judgment by pointing to gaps in the plaintiff's proof. Where the parties' experts conflict on general and specific causation, issues of fact remain…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 29, 2019

    Mantovi v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …types or to exposure levels in other studies. The court found the plaintiffs had not raised a triable issue on general or specific causation and granted the motion. It dismissed the claims and cross-claims against…