No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

3 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · October 25, 2016

    Ballard v. Ameron International Corporation (2016)

    …part of the exposure. Enclave jurisdiction would also require all defendants to join the removal, and General Electric had said it did not consent. Ameron had made no showing for federal officer removal. The court also…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Melendrez v. Ameron International Corporation (2015)

    In general, for the purposes of the causation requirement in workers' compensation, it is sufficient if the connection between work and the injury be a contributing cause of the injury. . . .' \[Citations.\]" (Id. at pp. 298-299…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion

    Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)

    …1982, the dual capacity exception to the general exclusivity of the workers' compensation remedy has been limited to the narrow factual circumstances presented where the employee's injury was caused by the employer's product, which…