No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012

    Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)

    The court granted summary judgment to General Electric, Crane, Foster Wheeler, Warren Pumps, IMO Industries, Buffalo Pumps, Armstrong International and CBS, and denied the plaintiffs relief on their strict liability and negligence claims. Under maritime law…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 22, 2011

    Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2011)

    Four consolidated asbestos cases in the federal asbestos MDL in Pennsylvania involved Navy veterans or a shipyard worker who developed mesothelioma. Robert Conner, James Prange and James Stone served at sea on Navy ships as a machinist's mate and…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021

    Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)

    The court granted the ten unopposed summary judgment motions of Eaton Hydraulics, Riley Power, Foster Wheeler, ViacomCBS, General Electric, Spence Engineering, GEA Mechanical, FMC, Velan Valve and Neles-Jamesbury, and denied the motions of Fisher Scientific…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 21, 2011

    Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2011)

    Four consolidated asbestos cases in the federal MDL-875 docket involved Navy-related mesothelioma. Robert Conner, James Prange and James Stone served aboard Navy ships, working with engine rooms, fire rooms and boilers. Hiram Peavy worked as a…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    Darlene Data sued many companies in her own right and as executrix of her husband Michael Data's estate. Mr. Data served in the Navy aboard the USS Newport News from 1969 to 1973. He later worked at Mesta Machine and then at the West Pittsburgh…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2017 · in the opinion

    Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …rock, floor tiles, and electrical equipment), and also while employed as a plumber's helper (from boilers and boiler insulation) during the period 1972 to 1982. Eugene Story-(deceased) Was exposed to Asbestos dust from valves…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's product and that the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a manufacturer's name, with no detail on where…

  8. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    There the canon avoids not contradiction but the superfluity of a specific provision that is swallowed by the general one, "violat\[ing\] the cardinal rule that, if possible, effect shall be given to every clause and…

  9. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

    …the general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer "knows or has reason to know" that its product "is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …To ensure reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION A. Motion to…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION Defendants contend that Captain Burger should not be allowed…