No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion

    Theodore v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2018)

    …on behalf of its former CHICAGO PUMP & NORTHERN PUMP BUSINESSES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C., GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, trading as NAPA AUTO PARTS, GOULDS PUMPS, INC., HARRISBURG…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 15, 2019

    Czulada v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …the complaint and cross-claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, so the Czulada plaintiffs prevailed on the motion. A New York court has general jurisdiction over a company that was, at the time of the exposure…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 31, 2019

    Dembski v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …for lack of personal jurisdiction, and severed and dismissed them. General jurisdiction over a corporation requires that it be at home in New York (place of incorporation or principal place of business), and specific jurisdiction under…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 22, 2019

    Shea v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …and New York keeps jurisdiction over injuries sustained there. That supplied the nexus for specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1) even though general jurisdiction was lacking. Personal Jurisdiction Worksites: Massachusetts Maritime Academy; Merchant Marine vessels…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 19, 2018

    Johnson v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …built, and asked for jurisdictional discovery. The court found no general jurisdiction issue and examined specific jurisdiction. It held that the plaintiff offered only an inference that an Aurora sales employee visited the Navy Yard, not…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2011 · in the opinion

    Graham v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2011)

    …is contemplated by it. Moreover, if defendant is concerned that plaintiffs counsel is on a general fishing expedition, then defendant's remedy is to screen and redact any information beyond the scope of plaintiffs request. Accordingly…