68 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 4
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 16, 2016
George v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…County state court. Even assuming consent-by-registration survives Daimler, Pennsylvania's registration statute limits general jurisdiction to acts occurring during the period of registration, so a registration that began after the alleged injury does not…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · October 30, 2012
Delsart v. Albany Felt Company, Inc. (2012)
Alan Delsart sued several companies, individually and as special administrator of the estate of his father, Millard Delsart, who developed mesothelioma allegedly from workplace asbestos exposure. The opinion gives no detail on where or how Millard…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 5, 2019
Klopman-Baerselman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
Eric Klopman-Baerselman, as personal representative of the estate of Rudie Klopman-Baerselman, sued Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and other companies in federal court in Washington. The suit alleged that Rudie died of mesothelioma caused by…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 12, 2020
Pizarro v. Astra Flooring Company (2020)
Renato Pizarro alleged he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working as a mechanic aboard Navy ships from 1975 to 1998. He and his wife Mercedita sued a number of companies in California state court, including National Steel and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Malone v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Nash Engineering Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Eric Scott Thompson, Franklin & Prokopik. Velan Valve Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Donald Robert Kinsley, Maron…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 20, 2012 · in the opinion
Ruppel v. AO Smith Corporation (2012)
…Pumps and Peerless Pumps; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., individually and as successor-in-interest to C.H. Wheeler; Garden Denver, Inc.; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific, LLC; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Honeywell International Inc., as successor-in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · November 7, 2016 · in the opinion
Hovsepian v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2016)
…AND CARLSON. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Anita Maria Kidd, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP, Julie Fix Meyer, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, Melanie R. King, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP & Raymond R. Fournie, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP. General Gasket Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 15, 2016 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…Wheeler Energy Corporation, Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.), General Electric Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc., The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company d/b/a A&P Supermarkets, Honeywell International…
-
Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific, LLC v. Fields (2013)
…GENERAL CABLE INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as a successor in interest to BICC CABLES CORP." For the purposes of this opinion, we assume that "Phelps Dodge" is incorporated in references to BICC CABLES CORP., or GENERAL…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Ms. Finch has not shown that Pfizer reasonably should have known that the pre-1978 records may have…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 29, 2018 · in the opinion
Brandes v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2018)
…INC., CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERCIVES, INC.; and SABERHAGEN HOLDINGS, INC., Respondents. No…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Duffy v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…explained: A fundamental principle of the statute that defines the jurisdiction of the appellate courts is that, as a general rule, a party may appeal only from "a final judgment entered in a civil or criminal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · October 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Lineberger v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…Erb Dean, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP & Richard T. Boyette, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P.. General Cable Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Stephanie G. Flynn, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, pro hac vice & Timothy Peck, Smith Moore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 9, 2015 · in the opinion
Nuutinen v. CBS Corporation (2015)
…Nuutinen during a shutdown in the early 70's, Vohs saw insulators in their general area remove an asbestos blanket from a flange bolting to the turbine. Removable insulation can be taken off and reused without…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Bucci v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2018)
…and right lungs, which has spread to his brain. He is alleged to have been exposed to asbestos from approximately 1975 through the 1980s while employed as a general utility mechanic, mechanic B, and heavy equipment…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · April 21, 2017
MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
…on reconsideration, found it lacked general or specific personal jurisdiction over CBS in Missouri, a loss for the plaintiffs. Missouri's foreign corporation registration statute does not constitute consent to general personal jurisdiction, per State ex…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 27, 2012
Bouchard v. CBS Corporation (2012)
…the agreement did not assume tort liability for asbestos exposure. Washington's general rule is that an asset purchaser is not liable for the seller's liabilities unless an exception applies. Take-Home Exposure; Successor Liability…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · Massachusetts Appeals Court · February 14, 2013 · in the opinion
Whiting v. CBS Corporation (2013)
…by asbestos products manufactured or later supplied by the defendants, and have shown that the plaintiff \has no reasonable expectation of proving an essential element of \[her\] case.' Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp., 410 Mass. 706…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2013)
…officer) ... for or relating to any act under color of such office..." II. DISCUSSION In general, a defendant can only remove a case to federal court if the plaintiff could have brought the action there originally…