68 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 4
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…517, 526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Absent a duty to retain destroyed records, there can be no spoliation. IV. Motion to Strike MNRM…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 29, 2011 · in the opinion
Kite v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2011)
…her under color of such office. . . ." (Complaint at 13-14). It is this language on which the plaintiff relies for his disclaimer argument. As a general matter, "the plaintiff \[is\] the master of the claim. . . ." Caterpillar…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 28, 2015 · in the opinion
McALVEY v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)
…limited to the frequency, regularity and proximity of Plaintiff's exposure to asbestos products in general and his conclusion that Plaintiff experienced a significant exposure to asbestos based on his work activities. Finally, Defendants argue that…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · November 30, 2012 · in the opinion
Ruppel v. CBS Corporation (2012)
…and agents," the removal statute promotes litigating federal defenses (like official immunity) in a federal forum so that "the operations of the general government \[are not\] arrested at the will of one of \[the states\]." Id.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…Gen. Stat. Ann. § 1D-5(7) (West 2018). A general awareness of danger is not enough to establish a conscious disregard of a known duty. Lee v. CertainTeed Corp., No. 5:13-CV-826-FL, 2015…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion
Lefevre v. CBS Corporation (2013)
…To avoid this result, courts have developed four exceptions to the general rule that liabilities are not transferred: (1) the purchaser expressly or impliedly agrees to assume liability; (2) the purchase is a de facto merger…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 20, 2018 · in the opinion
Clayton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)
…negligence, premises liability, conspiracy, and strict liability for abnormally dangerous activities. (SAC § V.) They seek general and special damages for pain, suffering, "loss of spousal relationship," disability, medical expenses, and economic loss. (Id.) Saberhagen moves for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · September 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Filipek v. the Boeing Company (2017)
…NO. 23: Admit that Plaintiff Marlin Filipek was diagnosed with an asbestos- related disease prior to May 19, 2010. ANSWER: Plaintiffs incorporate by reference General Objections 1-8. Subject to and without waiving these objections, admit…