4 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Ms. Finch has not shown that Pfizer reasonably should have known that the pre-1978 records may have…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · October 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Lineberger v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…Erb Dean, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP & Richard T. Boyette, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P.. General Cable Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Stephanie G. Flynn, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, pro hac vice & Timothy Peck, Smith Moore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…517, 526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Absent a duty to retain destroyed records, there can be no spoliation. IV. Motion to Strike MNRM…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…Gen. Stat. Ann. § 1D-5(7) (West 2018). A general awareness of danger is not enough to establish a conscious disregard of a known duty. Lee v. CertainTeed Corp., No. 5:13-CV-826-FL, 2015…