6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)
…at 1061. The court granted the suppliers summary judgment based on the sophisticated user/bulk supplier defense on the basis of its findings that: Eastman and Union Carbide supplied in bulk, via railroad tank cars and…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 19, 1994
Hartman v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1994)
… Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Loss of Consortium; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Union Electric — Labadie plant; Union Electric — Meramec plant; Washington University Research Center; Labadie Power House; Meramec Power House electrician Labadie Power House 1969…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 16, 1991
Fibreboard Corp. v. Pool (1991)
…the limitations defense, or the fault percentages. It held that a union poster was wrongly admitted but harmless. It found the evidence insufficient for Pool's $100,000 future medical award, so he must remit it…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 30, 1986 · in the opinion
Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1986)
…Appellees, and Johns-Manville Corporation, a New York Corporation; Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Unarco Industries, Inc., formerly known as Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, an Illinois Corporation; Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, a Delaware Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1985 · in the opinion
Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp. (1985)
…industry. His testimony on the state of the art has the same relevance in every asbestos case, regardless of which corporations are the defendants. In view of the commonality of the state of the art issue…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion
Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)
…respondents. \[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals March 6, 1991.\] GROSSE, C.J. The Celotex Corporation\[1\] and Raymark Industries, Inc. (collectively referred to as appellants) appeal a jury verdict and award to…