31 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 2
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Carlson v. 84 Lumber Company (2011)
…fourth specific torts factor is not useful to this Court's choice of law analysis. 2 Application of General Interest-Weighing Factors The choice of law analysis may not always turn on the quantity of contacts…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
…PROCEEDINGS Until it closed in 1989, Marcantoni was a Baltimore-based general construction contracting company that specialized in highway and utility work for local governments in the greater Baltimore area. Its headquarters was located on Broening…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)
…to chrysotile." \[3\] Although Silvestro again worked in construction after his career as boiler repairman, the evidence showed that use of asbestos in construction materials (and in general) was being curtailed by the 1970's, and…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 24, 2014 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Co. Inc. v. Galliher (2014)
…Civil Chapter 617.11 of the Ohio Jury Instructions provides an instruction on the general duty of care of a premises owner: The owner of the premises owes a duty to a frequenter to use ordinary…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · July 14, 2014 · in the opinion
Davidson v. Georgia Pacific LLC (2014)
…s testimony is reliable, including testing and testability, peer review and publication, evaluation of known rates of error, and general acceptance within the scientific community. See Daubert, 509 U.S. at 593-94, 113 S.Ct…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · May 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Graver v. Allentown Cement Co. (In re Liability Litigation, 2011)
…Second, it recognizes the general principle of deference to the plaintiff's choice of forum. Allowing removal only when the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses a defendant ensures that the plaintiff will not be inappropriately forced out of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Smith v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2017)
…Ltd.; BayerCropscience Inc.; Beazer East, Inc; Bird Incorporated; OneBeacon American Insurance Company; Houston General Insurance Company; The Stonewall Insurance Company; First State Insurance Company; American Insurance Company; Home Insurance Company; United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion
Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)
…breath. In so finding, Dr. Gelfand noted that, while the obstructive lung condition due to smoking showed "some improvement," in general, the reduction in lung diffusion remained severe. See Report of Dr. Gelfand concerning Frederick Summers…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion
Hicks v. Biltrite (2007)
…1126 (R.I. 2001) (citations omitted); Volino v. General Dynamics, 539 A.2d 531, 532-533 (R.I 1988). The moving party bears the initial burden of establishing that no genuine issues of material fact exist…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2011 · in the opinion
Graver v. Allentown Cement Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. VI), 2011)
…Second, it recognizes the general principle of deference to the plaintiff's choice of forum. Allowing removal only when the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses a defendant ensures that the plaintiff will not be inappropriately forced out of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Leech v. 3M Co. (2017)
…the removal statute's unanimity requirement, all defendants removing under the general removal statute must join in or consent to removal if they have been "properly joined and served."\[79\] Here, the parties do not dispute…