4 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021
Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)
…defendants, holding they owed no duty of care to Khosravan, and awarded respondents their costs on appeal. A defendant owes no duty to protect workers from asbestos at premises it did not own, possess or control…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2019
Malek v. Chevron U.S.A. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)
…was not a joint venturer or principal of the operator, and did not undertake responsibility for worker safety owes no duty of care; workers who only incidentally benefit from a contract are not intended third party…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020
Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)
…favor of the Exxon defendants. A defendant that did not own, possess or control the premises owes no premises or negligence duty to workers there, and a guarantee in a contract not intended to benefit the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)
…to the plaintiff nor sits in a relation to the parties that creates an affirmative duty to protect the plaintiff from harm. . . the defendant owes no legal duty to the plaintiff." (Brown, at p. 216; accord…