No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Lyons v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2017)

    …1078 \[109 Cal.Rptr.3d 371\], the plaintiffs alleged that the decedent had been exposed to asbestos by Bechtel Construction at two Pacific Gas and Electric sites constructed by Bechtel, "Contra Costa Buildings 6 and 7…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 4, 2024 · in the opinion

    Corin v. Arkema, Inc. (2024)

    …MRW. January 4, 2024. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge. Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Remand \[DE 26\] I. INTRODUCTION On October 31…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 23, 2022 · in the opinion

    Bader v. Johnson & Johnson (2022)

    …that has not gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific or medical community. Rather it was the theory of causation, that \[the pesticide\] caused plaintiff's autism, that has not gained general acceptance in the relevant…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2017 · in the opinion

    Alfaro v. Imerys Talc America Inc. (2017)

    …Fitzgerald's opinion was based on the excluded testing, and therefore was also inadmissible. However, the court found Fitzgerald could give the general opinion that the product was "friable. . . that when dispersed it can be inhaled…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Berg v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2019)

    …even commonsensically logical) rationale by which he could determine what percentage of the cans of Mennen shave talc sold in the relevant period contained talc from lots contaminated with chrysotile and/or amphibole minerals in general…