7 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 23, 2022 · in the opinion
Bader v. Johnson & Johnson (2022)
…with negligence, product liability, and concealment instructions that incorporated the asbestos-specific standard of proof for causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Berg v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2019)
…on "a cause of action for asbestos-related latent injuries, the plaintiff must first establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2017 · in the opinion
Alfaro v. Imerys Talc America Inc. (2017)
…would need to establish that this exposure was to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease she suffered. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 11, 2011 · in the opinion
Tedrick v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Matter of Nyc Asbestos Litig., 2011)
…the "first exposure" rule originating with Schmidt v Merchants Despatch Transp. Co. (270 NY 287 \[1936\]) and its progeny (e.g. Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 NY2d 449 \[1995\]; Blanco v American Tel. & Tel…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · April 29, 2020 · in the opinion
Castro v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2020)
…2) (B) only when the plaintiff contests, or the court questions, the defendant's allegation." Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014). Johnson & Johnson thus has satisfied the removal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 4, 2024 · in the opinion
Corin v. Arkema, Inc. (2024)
…1446(a). This requirement borrows from the pleading requirements set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 87 (2014). To satisfy this…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005
Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)
…said he was exposed to asbestos insulation on pipes, furnaces, ovens and machinery while tearing out and installing equipment, and it claimed the owners were liable as premises owners. The owners argued that Kentucky's workers'…