7 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · August 29, 2019 · in the opinion
Fishbain v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2019)
…Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY; THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; UNIVERSAL RAZOR INDUSTRIES, individually and as successor-in-interest to and d/b/a The Shulton Group and/or Shulton, Inc.…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · October 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Bernard v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (IN the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2012)
…AL., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ARLENE FEINBERG, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Defendant. 7991N, 107211/08, 190078/08, 190070/11. Decided October 2, 2012…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 22, 2022 · in the opinion
Cioni v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2022)
…PLASTICS ENGINEERING COMPANY, ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST FOR ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY AND ROSTONE CORPORATION, ROGERS CORPORATION, SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIVES, INC., AS SUCCESSOR TO NORTON COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WHITTAKER, CLARK & DANIELS…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 6, 2022 · in the opinion
Zicklin v. Bergdorf Goodman Inc. (2022)
…MACY'S INC., MERLE NORMAN COSMETICS, INC., REVLON, INC., THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP LLC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, CHRISTIAN DIOR, INC., CHRISTIAN DIOR NEW…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · September 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Hanson v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2018)
…cannot prove causation, required for each claim, as a matter of law. In an asbestos action, "causation is an essential element." Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 712 S.E.2d 537, 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)
…1999). Next, Cynthia notes that "not reasonably safe" is largely interchangeable with the phrase "unreasonably dangerous" in the context of negligence.\[1\] And, citing Nichols v. Union Underwear Co., Inc., 602 S.W.2d 429, 433…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 15, 2012 · in the opinion
Bernard v. Brookfield Props. Corp. (2012)
…To this extent Radovic is consistent with the federal authorities cited herein which hold that a corporation's attorney-client privilege extends to communications with its former employees regarding matters that took place within the scope…