Search

• Organization: Consolidated Rail Corporation ×
• Clear filters

7 results for “General Electric”

1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 20, 2012 · in the opinion

   Neuer v. American Art Clay Co., Inc. (2012)

   …Mr. Neuer testified that he was exposed to asbestos from working with steam lines and electrical equipment throughout his railroad career. He does not allude to asbestos exposure by reason of any other occupation. Defendants assert…

2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · March 2, 2010 · in the opinion

   Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ray EX rel. Boyd (2010)

   …mplicit in the design of the Rail Act is the premise that in personam claims, including general unsecured claims asserting successor liability, would not and could not follow the assets conveyed to Conrail pursuant to the…

3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 24, 2018 · in the opinion

   Jarrett v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2018)

   …Accordingly, Jarrett argues that her claim should have gone before a jury for a determination as to whether lung cancer was a "known risk" and/or whether the release was unenforceable as a general boilerplate release…

4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 2, 2022 · in the opinion

   Nuckols v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2022)

   …Decedent reasonably did not know the purpose of the questioning. Perhaps Decedent could only have reasonably been expected to know of general impacts of the exposure to his health, but not that it could cause cancer…

5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 23, 2023 · in the opinion

   Anderson v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (2023)

   …used for choosing those studies. Appellee's Brief at 20. According to Conrail, Nothing in \[Dr.\] Levin's report suggested that he employed any methodology to opine on general causation, much less a generally accepted one…

6. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 22, 2016 · in the opinion

   Arpin v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2016)

   …626, 68 S.Ct. 296. Prior to the action, Callen had executed a general release relieving the railroad company from liability for personal injuries sustained in the occurrence. Id. at 626-627, 68 S.Ct. 296…

7. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 19, 2009 · in the opinion

   Riedel v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (2009)

   …make it into the final draft. The court stated that "while the General Assembly may well have intended all asbestos-related cancer claims to be subject to the new legislation, that intent is not clearly expressed…