23 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Hopeman Brothers, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co. (2018)
…11) (emphasis in original). Hopeman then explains that, in light of Appalachian Insurance Co. v. General Electric Co., 8 N.Y.3d 162, 831 N.Y.S.2d 742, 863 N.E.2d 994, 999 (2007)…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · June 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Penn. Gen. Ins. v. Park-Ohio Ind. (2010)
126 Ohio St.3d 98 (2010) 2010-Ohio-2745 930 N.E.2d 800 PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS. No. 2009-0104. Submitted December 2, 2009…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)
…in other jurisdictions, that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability policy bars coverage only for traditional environmental pollution such as oil spills or the dumping of hazardous waste into the natural environment. Id.…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)
…that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion
Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)
…Hatfield conducted a personal inspection of the building and described the overall condition of the Spraycraft in the building as fair.\[146\] The Spraycraft was installed primarily above suspended ceilings and in mechanical and electrical closets…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion
Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)
…were not dangerous. There was concern about the dustiness of Armaspray — but not so much for health reasons as for reasons of cleanup and potential damage to electrical equipment. The specifications for Armaspray called for good…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018
Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)
…in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 20, 2008
Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (2008)
The appeals court reversed the trial court's judgment denying Pennsylvania General Insurance equitable contribution from Nationwide and Continental, and remanded for further proceedings on the shares each owes. Under Ohio's all-sums approach, an…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1999 · in the opinion
Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp. (1999)
The "fund" in this case comprised both the general assets of Fibreboard and the insurance assets provided by the two policies, see 90 F. 3d, at 982 (describing the fund as Fibreboard's entire equity and…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)
…and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016
In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)
…8.3 of the Plan and Continental had to respond, so the Trustee prevailed. A chapter 11 plan is a contract interpreted under general contract rules (here Illinois law). The plan's term "allocated percentage" has…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)
…UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · December 13, 1995 · in the opinion
Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management (1995)
…FM Insurance Company, Republic Insurance Company, First State Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Houston General Insurance Company, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Old Republic Insurance [\1179] Company, American Centennial Insurance Company, The Constitution State…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)
…UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, Including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 Through 400, Defendants (Allianz Underwriters…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · January 26, 2007 · in the opinion
In re Congoleum Corp. (2007)
…of asbestos claims including: (i) all of the Debtors' interest in asbestos insurance coverage provided in their general liability insurance (ii) 3,800,000 new shares of Congoleum Class A common stock (but only if the…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Api, Inc. (2005)
…without the insurer's consent to the terms of settlement. Such terms again are a justifiable incident of the insurers' general right to manage the processing of claims; they reflect insurers' understandable interest in containing their…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Continental Casualty v. Chatz for Cfb/wfb Trust (2018)
…from gaining an advantage by taking inconsistent positions, but also because of general considerations of the orderly administration of justice and regard for the dignity of judicial proceedings, and to protect against a litigant playing fast…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 15, 2017 · in the opinion
In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2017)
…The Trustee has accepted this proposition.\[22\] According to the Illinois Supreme Court: The general rule is that where a person by his or her statements and conduct leads a party to do something that the…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion
US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)
…coverage action when that proof has not yet been established in the underlying action. Courts have addressed these competing concerns by crafting the general rule that if an insured settles an underlying claim prior to verdict…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 27, 1998 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation (1998)
…Amchem, \_\_\_ U.S. at \_\_\_, 117 S.Ct. at 2248. This general theme, expressed forcefully in Amchem, is reinforced by the Court's discussion of specific issues, most of which are highly relevant to the instant case…