No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …were not dangerous. There was concern about the dustiness of Armaspray — but not so much for health reasons as for reasons of cleanup and potential damage to electrical equipment. The specifications for Armaspray called for good…

  2. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016

    In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)

    …8.3 of the Plan and Continental had to respond, so the Trustee prevailed. A chapter 11 plan is a contract interpreted under general contract rules (here Illinois law). The plan's term "allocated percentage" has…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion

    Continental Casualty v. Chatz for Cfb/wfb Trust (2018)

    …from gaining an advantage by taking inconsistent positions, but also because of general considerations of the orderly administration of justice and regard for the dignity of judicial proceedings, and to protect against a litigant playing fast…

  4. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 15, 2017 · in the opinion

    In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2017)

    …The Trustee has accepted this proposition.\[22\] According to the Illinois Supreme Court: The general rule is that where a person by his or her statements and conduct leads a party to do something that the…