10 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)
…Inc., 151 F.3d 297 (5th Cir.1998). Owens Corning, a major asbestos manufacturer, sought to create a "National Settlement Program" outside the judicial system by entering private contracts with plaintiffs' firms that would have settled…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 27, 1998 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation (1998)
…limited fund. Fibreboard was recently acquired by Owens-Corning in a tender offer for about $515 million cash, plus $85 million of assumed debt. See Andrea Puchalsky, Owens-Corning to Buy Fibreboard for $515 million, WALL…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)
…Corp., 667 F.Supp. 1523, 1538 (S.D. Ga. 1983) (endeavoring to provide guidance "carefully, methodically and with an eye toward practical solutions"); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 138 N.J. 437, 477-78…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · December 13, 1995 · in the opinion
Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management (1995)
…including California, see Montrose Chemical, 10 Cal.4th 645, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 324, 897 P.2d 1, New Jersey, see Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance Co., 138 N.J. 437, 650 A.2d 974…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)
… Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America, supra, 667 F.2d 1044 n.19, 1047 n.25; Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., supra, 138 N.J. 457. For these reasons, we are persuaded…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion
US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)
…the reasons discussed below, we conclude that that cause should be characterized as the continuing process of the manufacture and sale of asbestos containing products. On point again is Owens-Illinois Inc. v. United Insurance Co…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion
Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)
…the trial court's method of apportionment is not challenged on appeal, we find no error in the decision to hold each policy responsible in full subject to such apportionment.\[17\] (See also Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 20, 2008
Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (2008)
…denying Pennsylvania General Insurance equitable contribution from Nationwide and Continental, and remanded for further proceedings on the shares each owes. Under Ohio's all-sums approach, an insurer selected by the insured that pays an entire…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)
…to the trust fund received from other primary insurers; c) Continental owes no recovery to the Trust with respect to any Trust Claim absent an allocated percentage proposed to Continental; d) The Trustee did not comply…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Api, Inc. (2005)
…exception among the insurers may be CNA, which alleges that the Debtor owes it a sum of money on account of the premium arrangement under the terms of its policy, and that that debt arose pre…