130 results for “General Electric”, page 5 of 7
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion
DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)
…in every proceeding. However, this Court's case law makes clear that a proper and thorough application of Frye allows the trial judge to inquire [\1235] beyond bare assertions of general acceptance. Daubert, on the other…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · March 29, 2018
Chesher v. 3M Company (2018)
…specific causation expert testimony, the plaintiff must present evidence of the amount and duration of asbestos dust exposure, and general allegations of periodic exposure over many years are not enough. Causation; Expert Testimony; Maritime Law and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…Dkt. \# 146) at 12 ("The medical literature has established malignant mesothelioma. . . as, in general, a dose response disease, that is, each exposure to asbestos-containing dust has been shown to contribute to cause diffuse malignant mesothelioma. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…Court must consider whether Oneal's claims are governed by federal admiralty law or by state law. In general, admiralty law applies to a tort action when the alleged tort occurred on navigable waters and the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)
…must adduce sufficient evidence to support every essential element of a claim to make a submissible case). The general test for proximate cause is whether an injury is "a reasonable and probable consequence" of a defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)
…t is \[\] unfair to require manufacturers of nondefective products to shoulder a burden of liability when they derived no economic benefit from the sale of the products that injured the plaintiff").\[16\] As a general matter…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · May 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Spurlin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…be contrary to the command for uniformity between rules governing the same injury, whether under the Jones Act or under the general maritime law. See id. There being no evidence that punitive damages were traditionally awarded…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
…. ." \[Doc. \#333-1, at 18-19\]. \[2\] Hovsepian claimed breach of warranty under Massachusetts General Laws ch. 106, § 2-318. He argued that "the defendants expressly and impliedly warranted that the asbestos and asbestoscontaining products and…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Amato v. Bell & Gossett (2015)
…of Pittsburgh, 409 Pa. 357, 186 A.2d 399 (1962), which it asserts stands for the general rule that "for the same injury, an injured party may have but one satisfaction." Id. at 402. However, Crane…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 18, 2014 · in the opinion
Grande v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc. (2014)
…false representation; (4) intentional tort/intentional failure to warn; (5) premises/contractor liability; (6) general negligence; and (7) vicarious liability. (Id.) Plaintiff has since dismissed a number of Defendants from the above-captioned matter. Only Plaintiff…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 20, 2015 · in the opinion
Hellam v. Crane Co. (2015)
…to Central Supply, 0.5 percent to Bendix, 0 percent to Hellam and General Motors, and 2.5 percent to "All Others." The trial court entered the original judgment against Crane in December 2012. That judgment…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 14, 2013 · in the opinion
Tobin v. Aerco Intl. (2013)
…a seaman, Mr. Tobin stood watch on the bridge and deck, painted, and performed general repairs. He also visited the ship's engine room below deck where his coworkers performed work on pipes, valves, pumps, turbines…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 23, 2015 · in the opinion
Hernandez-Vega v. Fisher Controls Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…early 1960s; and that any packing sold by Fisher for use with its valves was pre-sized. Arguments Fisher maintains that this court lacks both general and specific jurisdiction. This argument was not waived, Fisher asserts…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion
Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…Salisbury, 2014 WL 345214, at [\8]. This court will follow that middle path. In general, consistent with the bare metal defense, a manufacturer is not liable for materials it did not supply. But a duty may…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 2, 2009 · in the opinion
In re New York City Asbestos Litigation v. AC & S., Inc. (2009)
…Dalton was a plumber, Flynn was an iron worker, McNamara was a roofer, Troiano was a plumber/general contractor and Zeitler was a sailor/painter (see Comeford Aff. in Support of Consolidation OSC at ¶¶ 7-18…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 6, 2013 · in the opinion
Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)
…concluded that jurisdictional disclaimers are invalid in the context of the federal officer removal statute (as opposed to the general removal statute) for two related reasons. "First, the presumption under the general removal statute favors remand…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Krik v. Crane Co. (2014)
…Arnold Brody, who intend to testify that, in general, each and every exposure to asbestos products results in injury to the person so exposed. Krik believes that this testimony will help him to establish that his…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2013)
…officer) ... for or relating to any act under color of such office..." II. DISCUSSION In general, a defendant can only remove a case to federal court if the plaintiff could have brought the action there originally…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)
…person's expertise. Generalized knowledge of a particular subject will not necessarily enable an expert to testify as to a specific subset of the general field of the expert's knowledge. Martinez v. Sakurai Graphic Sys…